Teaching Geographic Information Science and Technology in Higher Education 2011
DOI: 10.1002/9781119950592.ch2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Making the Case for GIS&T in Higher Education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) framework, which was formulated by Shulman (), advanced by Mishra and Koehler (), and most recently applied to GIS by Rickles, Ellul, and Haklay (), conceptualizes knowledge areas for instructors as falling within three broad categories: (1) content (e.g., subject matter expertise; often supported by structured resources like the GIS&T BoK); (2) technology (e.g., understanding and utilizing technologies and digital resources; commonly focused on the use of GIS in the classroom via a laboratory component); and (3) pedagogy (e.g., comprehension of teaching and learning processes and specific approaches/methods such as experiential learning, etc.). Regarding the latter, the need for improved pedagogical approaches in teaching GIS&T has been highlighted by recent surveys of employers suggesting that new geospatial professionals are often poorly prepared to take on real‐world problems (Solem, Cheung, & Schlemper, ; Sinton, ; Wikle & Fagin, ; Mathews & Wikle, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) framework, which was formulated by Shulman (), advanced by Mishra and Koehler (), and most recently applied to GIS by Rickles, Ellul, and Haklay (), conceptualizes knowledge areas for instructors as falling within three broad categories: (1) content (e.g., subject matter expertise; often supported by structured resources like the GIS&T BoK); (2) technology (e.g., understanding and utilizing technologies and digital resources; commonly focused on the use of GIS in the classroom via a laboratory component); and (3) pedagogy (e.g., comprehension of teaching and learning processes and specific approaches/methods such as experiential learning, etc.). Regarding the latter, the need for improved pedagogical approaches in teaching GIS&T has been highlighted by recent surveys of employers suggesting that new geospatial professionals are often poorly prepared to take on real‐world problems (Solem, Cheung, & Schlemper, ; Sinton, ; Wikle & Fagin, ; Mathews & Wikle, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current focus on science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) in education makes this practice increasingly important (Sinton 2012;Baker et al 2015). With stiff competition for classroom time and budget dollars, geographic educators must continually make the case that geography deserves a place at the education table.…”
Section: Using Gis To Illustrate Geography's Core Themesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Japan, for example, where GIS is common for educational purposes, a lack of teacher training is recognized (Yuda & Itoh, 2006). In the USA, its use is mainly due to local iniciatives (Sinton, 2012). The EU does have a long tradition of institutional support for educational proposals on GIS, for example with a pioneering 2003 project called "GISAS" (Borghs, M., & Johansson, 2009).…”
Section: Gis As a Didactic Resourcementioning
confidence: 99%