2017
DOI: 10.1127/nos/2017/0385
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Making the case for a formal Anthropocene Epoch: an analysis of ongoing critiques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
82
0
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
0
82
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Business-as-usual is taking the planet into a 'hothouse Earth' state unprecedented for millions of years in geological history (Winkelmann et al, 2015;Ganopolski et al, 2016), while calls for rapid decarbonisation of the global economic system to meet the Paris climate agreement will also have complex consequences involving an intensified entanglement of social, economic and biophysical processes and their resulting feedback dynamics, up to the planetary scale (Mengel et al, 2018). Despite extensive debate about the Anthropocene (Lewis 15 and Maslin, 2015; Hamilton, 2015;Brondizio et al, 2016;Zalasiewicz et al, 2017), and growing recognition of the limitations of current Earth system models for analysis and policy advice in the context of these shifting dynamics (van Vuuren et al, 2016;Verburg et al, 2016;Donges et al, 2017a, b), little has been done to address the fundamental challenge of systematically reviewing the conceptual foundations of Earth system modelling to include dynamic social processes, rather than externalising them (Bretherton et al, 1986(Bretherton et al, , 1988. 20 To understand planetary-scale social-ecological dynamics, models of the World-Earth system are urgently needed.…”
Section: Revisiting Earth System Analysis For the Anthropocenementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Business-as-usual is taking the planet into a 'hothouse Earth' state unprecedented for millions of years in geological history (Winkelmann et al, 2015;Ganopolski et al, 2016), while calls for rapid decarbonisation of the global economic system to meet the Paris climate agreement will also have complex consequences involving an intensified entanglement of social, economic and biophysical processes and their resulting feedback dynamics, up to the planetary scale (Mengel et al, 2018). Despite extensive debate about the Anthropocene (Lewis 15 and Maslin, 2015; Hamilton, 2015;Brondizio et al, 2016;Zalasiewicz et al, 2017), and growing recognition of the limitations of current Earth system models for analysis and policy advice in the context of these shifting dynamics (van Vuuren et al, 2016;Verburg et al, 2016;Donges et al, 2017a, b), little has been done to address the fundamental challenge of systematically reviewing the conceptual foundations of Earth system modelling to include dynamic social processes, rather than externalising them (Bretherton et al, 1986(Bretherton et al, , 1988. 20 To understand planetary-scale social-ecological dynamics, models of the World-Earth system are urgently needed.…”
Section: Revisiting Earth System Analysis For the Anthropocenementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neglecting this background does not make sense, as most of this literature, including digital reproductions the original books of Stoppani or Le Conte, among others, are freely available on Internet. By reading these books it is easy to realize the inaccuracy of some statements as, for example, that of Zalasiewicz et al (2017) who contend that the supposed "Anthropocene" precursors ". .…”
Section: The Only Survivormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AWG was created in 2009 and is formed by 39 members, including several of the more enthusiastic defenders of the "Anthropocene" as a new epoch of the GTS, who have been very active promoting such initiative in the scientific literature (e.g. Steffen et al, 2011;Zalasiewicz et al, 2011aZalasiewicz et al, , b, 2015Zalasiewicz et al, , 2016bZalasiewicz et al, , 2017Waters et al, 2014Waters et al, , 2016 and also in public media. But the "Anthropocene" is still in a very early stage of the ICS protocol for approval and ratification.…”
Section: Modifying the Geological Time Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(Waters et al 2016). Critiques relevant to use of the 'Anthropocene' as a geological concept are considered by Zalasiewicz et al (2017). 2.…”
Section: Producing a Better Anthropocenementioning
confidence: 99%