Abstract:Activities.&dquo;I am determined that our new training camps, as well as the surrounding zones within an effective radius, shall not be places of temptation and peril.&dquo; Into these words, written six weeks after America's entry into the world conflict, the Secretary of War condensed a policy not only strikingly new in American preparations, but also in the military history of the world. They were included in a letter written on May 26 to the governors of all the states. Essentially they only gave expressio… Show more
“…It was, as Army Lieutenant George Anderson boasted, "a united and coherent front … for the drastic suppression of the offence." 20 Arguing on behalf of Carrie Buck before the Supreme Court in May 1927, attorney I.P. Whitehead urged the Court to recognize that the Virginia law "violates her When John T. Neufeld, a Mennonite, claimed conscientious objector status, he was sentenced to fifteen years hard labor in the military prison at Leavenworth.…”
“…It was, as Army Lieutenant George Anderson boasted, "a united and coherent front … for the drastic suppression of the offence." 20 Arguing on behalf of Carrie Buck before the Supreme Court in May 1927, attorney I.P. Whitehead urged the Court to recognize that the Virginia law "violates her When John T. Neufeld, a Mennonite, claimed conscientious objector status, he was sentenced to fifteen years hard labor in the military prison at Leavenworth.…”
“…It was, as Army Lieutenant George Anderson boasted, "a united and coherent front … for the drastic suppression of the offence. "19 Arguing on behalf of Carrie Buck before the Supreme Court in May 1927, attorney I.P.…”
By most accounts, the career of the Selective Service Act of 1917 before the Supreme Court of the United States was remarkably short. In January 1918, the Court dispensed with constitutional challenges to the recently adopted military conscription law in a brief, unanimous opinion following a session of oral argument in which the justices were widely reported to be bored by the case and impatient to issue their ruling. But the Supreme Court's engagement with conscription and its enforcement marked a contingent and transformative moment for the Constitution, the Court, and the United States. The legacies of the Court's ruling in Arver v. United States include a surprising cast of characters: not only drafted soldiers and conscientious objectors, but a Hungarian refugee, a Canadian nurse, and an unwed teenage mother from rural Virginia. A century later, as Americans continue to grapple with the obligations of citizenship, the limits of federal power, and the extent of personal privacy, we might pause to consider a crucial moment when war brought the federal government into direct contact with the body and soul of every American citizen. 1
This essay examines the influence of the social purity movement on the U.S. government's campaign to protect servicemen from the temptations of drink and illicit sex during World War I. This influence had been forged in the context of U.S. imperialism in the two decades prior to American entry into the war, as purity reformers linked the sexual morality and temperance of soldiers serving in occupied territories overseas to racial purity and national character at home. War Department policymakers who were allied with the purity movement likewise understood male moral restraint and sexual self-control to underpin democratic self-governance. This linkage between civic virtue and moral virtue was especially problematic at the outset of the war, as many native-born Americans (progressive policymakers included) questioned whether all members of the ethnically and racially diverse nation had the capacity for self-government. The goals of social purity and wartime policymakers were thus aligned as the War Department launched its crusade against liquor and sexual vice within the military. Government officials required moral sobriety of servicemen in order to remake the body politic. But even as they demanded virtuous conduct from the man in uniform, they simultaneously infantilized the “soldier lad” in their effort to safeguard him.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.