2005
DOI: 10.1525/nr.2005.9.1.109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Making the American Religious Fringe: Exotics, Subversives, and Journalists, 1955–1993

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cowan 2003; Daschke & Ashcraft 2005; Shupe & Bromley 1985; Shupe & Darnell 2006), to news media’s coverage of significant events such as the Peoples Temple’s mass murders/suicides in Jonestown, Guyana and the Branch Davidians’ standoff with the Federal Bureau of Investigation (see, e.g. Cowan & Hadden 2004; McCloud 2004; Wright 1997), scholars have embraced numerous sources to understand NRMs’ social significance. One understudied data source is popular culture such as films, entertainment television, comic strips, and jokes (although see, e.g.…”
Section: Why New Religious Movements (Nrms) and Animated Sitcoms?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cowan 2003; Daschke & Ashcraft 2005; Shupe & Bromley 1985; Shupe & Darnell 2006), to news media’s coverage of significant events such as the Peoples Temple’s mass murders/suicides in Jonestown, Guyana and the Branch Davidians’ standoff with the Federal Bureau of Investigation (see, e.g. Cowan & Hadden 2004; McCloud 2004; Wright 1997), scholars have embraced numerous sources to understand NRMs’ social significance. One understudied data source is popular culture such as films, entertainment television, comic strips, and jokes (although see, e.g.…”
Section: Why New Religious Movements (Nrms) and Animated Sitcoms?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two more recent studies have added to this literature by examining how those in power have constructed religious ‘others’ in negative ways and thereby enacted intolerance. Religious historian Sean McCloud (2003), in The Making of the American Religious Fringe , analyzes journalistic constructions of the ‘cult fringe,’ the ‘margins’ of religious life. The term religious intolerance is absent, yet the concept itself is present as his analysis provides a model for understanding how those in positions of dominance ‘symbolically reproduced and legitimized inequalities’ (p. 4).…”
Section: Identifying Themes In Religious Intolerancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relationship of the contemporary religion of Witchcraft to the mass media is different to that of most other new religious movements. Media representations of new religious movements tend to be negative, characterizing them as “cults,” wacky, or deviant (Beckford 1999; McCloud 2004; Richardson 2001). In contrast, television programs such as Charmed or Buffy the Vampire Slayer portray Witchcraft positively, and even as desirable, associated with successful participation in mainstream society, even if the religion is not presented completely seriously (Aloi 2007; Foltz 2005).…”
Section: Witchcraft and Mediamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, the representations of Witchcraft in the mass media and in popular books are overwhelmingly positive. Few other new religious movements have entire shelves in mainstream bookstores devoted to books by practitioners of the religion or magazines distributed on mainstream news stands that promote the religion in a positive light (McCloud 2006). Furthermore, where other religions struggle to redefine themselves to engage with environmental concerns (Tucker 2003), or an egalitarian role for women (Salomonsen 2002), Witchcraft is a religion that explicitly values the environment (it normally self-defines as an earth-based spirituality) and has been embraced by some feminists because of the worship of a Goddess instead of, or in conjunction with, the worship of a God (Jensen and Thompson 2008).…”
Section: Witchcraft and Mediamentioning
confidence: 99%