Making Sense Through Face: Identity and Social Interaction in a Consultancy Task Force

Abstract

In this article we investigate the dynamic connection between individual and social processes of sensemaking in the context of group-based interaction. Drawing on Goffman's theory of face-to-face behaviour, we develop two main arguments. First, the grounding of identity underlying group-based interaction typically involves repeated face games during which participants attempt to influence the patterns of interaction while maintaining a coherent image of self. Second, face games generate an 'interaction order' that has structuring properties and is therefore central to the social construction of sense within a group setting. We illustrate our contribution through an empirical study of face games and sensemaking within a consultancy task force. The study shows that the copresence of participants during group-based interaction is in itself an occasion for sensemaking as it enacts language-based controversies that require composition through shared construction of meaning. In addition, our findings highlight that early impressions generate sticky patterns of interaction that constrain further exchanges and affect the development and outcomes of group sensemaking. A main implication is that positive outcomes of sensemaking are contingent upon the ability of the participants collectively to generate interaction orders that are conducive to working consensus. In this regard, sensegiving mechanisms such as leadership can constructively orient interaction amongs professionals by providing a common set of expectations about behaviours.

Organizing for the Big One: A Review of Case Studies and a Research Agenda for Multi‐Agency Disaster Response

“…In these cases, persons or agencies tend to withhold information, act in an uncoordinated way, or commit resources based on individual instead of strategic considerations. In social psychology, this phenomenon is termed impression management (Leary & Kowalski, 1990;Patriotta & Spedale, 2009). In addition to ineffective information sharing and resource deployment, actions driven by motives of impression management also tend to hamper the development of trust (Garnett et al, 2007).…”

Dancing in the dark: Making sense of managerial roles during strategic conversations

“…The objective of the action-research was to help the team develop a strategic project for the association. This supposed that the managers and the director would also agree on their respective roles in the project (see also Patriotta & Spedale, 2009;2011).…”

“…It also impedes the creation of a common ground for making sense of the strategic orientations to be followed by the organization (see also Patriotta and Spedale, 2009). …”

Categorization and identification: The identity work of ‘business sellers’ on eBay

“…Through identity work, individuals strive to come to terms with social expectations, and thereby to achieve a balance between the 'self' and the social roles that pertain to them in a given milieu (Gioia et al, 2010;Patriotta and Spedale, 2009;Watson, 2008). For example, Elsbach (2009) has shown that toy designers in a large corporation engage in identity work when they perceive that, by treating them as mere employees, colleagues and external observers may misunderstand or threaten their desired identity as 'creative workers'.…”