2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102133
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Making sense of the politics in the climate change loss & damage debate

Abstract: Highlights Deploying a political ethnographic sensibility can help to unpack the politics around L&D. L&D is not a monolith, but catalyses unresolved clashes under the UNFCCC. Compensation is a visible one but means different things to different Parties. Some Parties still question L&D as a third pillar of climate action. Unpacking the politics can enhance transparency in deliberations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, Wapner (2014) states that a third dimensionclimate suffering-is becoming increasingly familiar. The concept of climate suffering links closely to the issue of 'loss and damage from climate change', which is increasingly important in the climate negotiations and is now considered the third pillar-alongside mitigation and adaptation-of climate policy (Broberg and Martinez Romera 2020;Calliari et al 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Wapner (2014) states that a third dimensionclimate suffering-is becoming increasingly familiar. The concept of climate suffering links closely to the issue of 'loss and damage from climate change', which is increasingly important in the climate negotiations and is now considered the third pillar-alongside mitigation and adaptation-of climate policy (Broberg and Martinez Romera 2020;Calliari et al 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent organisational and trans-organisational ethnographies have revealed the internal logics and everyday rationalities of institutional mechanisms (MacDonald 2015;Thaler 2021). At the international level ethnographic approaches are deployed to make visible and thereby 'make sense' of politics and power in climate negotiations, whether through CEE involving large teams researching at many sites, building on Marcus' (1995) 'multi-site' ethnography (Corson et al 2014) or studies undertaken by fewer researchers (Calliari et al 2020).…”
Section: An Ethnographic Approach To Studying Climate Governancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…By hanging out, researchers can capture how people contextualize their ideas in the before and after moments of formal interviews or by 'following' research participants in their daily work (Billo and Mountz 2015). In international climate governance research, hanging out has often involved following people from the formal negotiation room to corridors and attending 'cocktail parties' (Calliari et al 2020;…”
Section: [Insert Figure 1 Here] Hanging Outmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, expect the issues of Loss and Damage and Climate Justice to be central to the success, perceived and real, of the negotiations. Many vulnerable countries hope that agreements can be secured without the US and EU blocking them (Calliari et al, 2020).…”
Section: Cop27 Egyptmentioning
confidence: 99%