FIE'99 Frontiers in Education. 29th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Designing the Future of Science and Engineering E
DOI: 10.1109/fie.1999.839224
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Making sense of teaching methods in computing education

Abstract: Abwiict -The goal of this paper is to provide an initial guidepost for CS educators seeking to make beffer use of editcational theory research. We provide an overview of the latest and most prominent methods for science teaching, and discuss their application to CS edumtion. We provide exuvtpks of current applications. Far those methods which have nor yet been applied to CS, we olrtline possible future opplicutions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
2

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, researchers in faculties of education primarily investigate learning in elementary and secondary schools, which emphasize the elementary skills of reading, writing and arithmetic, and introductions to subjects of the humanities, social studies and science. Therefore, relatively few CS educators are familiar with educational theories and relatively few specialists in education have attempted to apply these theories in computer science education (CSE), though recently attempts have been made to bridge the gap (Booth, 2001;Powers & Powers, 1999).…”
Section: Rationalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, researchers in faculties of education primarily investigate learning in elementary and secondary schools, which emphasize the elementary skills of reading, writing and arithmetic, and introductions to subjects of the humanities, social studies and science. Therefore, relatively few CS educators are familiar with educational theories and relatively few specialists in education have attempted to apply these theories in computer science education (CSE), though recently attempts have been made to bridge the gap (Booth, 2001;Powers & Powers, 1999).…”
Section: Rationalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…La propuesta de una dinámica de preguntas abiertas involucra la realización de actividades asociadas a la discusión y resolución de problemas lo que permite a los y las estudiantes a la discusión sobre el proceso de deducción que han utilizado. Por lo que se logra promover la construcción del conocimiento mientras los y las estudiantes interactúan en el marco de un proceso reflexivo guiado por el profesor (Powers & Powers, 1999 Entre las ventajas del uso de preguntas de selección múltiple (Roberts, 2006) se indica que proveen de rápida retroalimentación, pueden ser automáticamente evaluadas, y pueden almacenarse en bases de datos de preguntas para ser reutilizadas. Entre las desventajas, se argumenta que en su construcción se requiere de un esfuerzo considerable, que solo pueden evaluar conocimiento y memorización, y no consideran aspectos de análisis y creatividad, resultando en que los estudiantes adoptan una actitud superficial al aprendizaje.…”
Section: Revisión De La Literaturaunclassified
“…'' In addition, in the proposed dynamic, isolated questions ought not to be used. In the measure that each question is linked to the previous question, the process is enriched from a constructionist perspective, since the new learning is constructed on the basis of the student's previous learning [28].…”
Section: Mcq For Improving Collaboration and Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%