1995
DOI: 10.1007/bf02356452
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Making sense of students' science: The construction of a model of tinkering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These new observations however, did not easily mesh with my reading of Roth's notion of collective. Recent studies (Jane & Jobling, 1995;Parsons, 1995;Roth, 1995aRoth, , 1995bRoth, , 1995cTobin & Skinner, 1995) involving the integration of science and technology focused upon understanding the learner through a constructivist perspective. Through the literature research I came to realise that most interpretive research on open-ended design projects ignored the social factors, the implicit working agreements which influence the collective nature of knowledge building.…”
Section: Elizamentioning
confidence: 98%
“…These new observations however, did not easily mesh with my reading of Roth's notion of collective. Recent studies (Jane & Jobling, 1995;Parsons, 1995;Roth, 1995aRoth, , 1995bRoth, , 1995cTobin & Skinner, 1995) involving the integration of science and technology focused upon understanding the learner through a constructivist perspective. Through the literature research I came to realise that most interpretive research on open-ended design projects ignored the social factors, the implicit working agreements which influence the collective nature of knowledge building.…”
Section: Elizamentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In a study examining tinkering behaviours in the elementary Science classroom, Parsons uses both qualitative and quantitative approaches to investigate the intuitive methods students use and apply in learning physical science concepts [16,17]. Parsons develops a model of tinkering behaviours providing a number of characteristics pertaining to different types of tinkering that can be observed.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, cross-disciplinary data suggest that 'exploratory learning styles' or 'tinkering behaviours' are expressed more predominantly in males than females across a variety of populations [2,12,16]. In Computer Science (CS) literature this gendered tendency has been surmised of CS students [8,10,21], but never studied directly as it has in other fields.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In education tinkering is often encouraged because of its expected educational benefits (Rowe, 1978). Parsons (1995) postulated there are many factors that contribute to a student's tinkering ability. The three most common factors are experimental, social, and personal.…”
Section: Tinkering Self-efficacymentioning
confidence: 99%