2001
DOI: 10.1111/1468-2230.00349
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Making Sense of Equality Law: A Review of the Hepple Report

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Harman's work as secretary of state for equalities entailed review of the legislative framework, responding to domestic and external (European Union) pressures for change (Grimshaw, 2007;Squires, 2007), and drawing on advocacy and research by leading equalities campaigners and experts, which reflected dissatisfaction with the prevailing approach relying on individual litigation (Conley, 2014;Deakin et al, 2012;Hepple, 2012;Kahn and Meehan, 1992;Rubery and Grimshaw, 2015). The new model, as outlined in the 2001 Hepple report, rested on three basic principles: strong incentives for internal scrutiny by organizations; engagement with stakeholders; and an independent enforcement agency with the ability to apply deterrent sanctions if voluntarism fails (Hepple, 2012: 65; see also Fredman, 2008;Harrington, 2001;Hepple, 2011a). Responding to the Hepple report's recommendations, the Labour Party pledged support for a single equality bill in its 2005 manifesto, but it took another two years for draft texts to be prepared and opened to consultation.…”
Section: Policy Change Under Labour (1997-2010)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Harman's work as secretary of state for equalities entailed review of the legislative framework, responding to domestic and external (European Union) pressures for change (Grimshaw, 2007;Squires, 2007), and drawing on advocacy and research by leading equalities campaigners and experts, which reflected dissatisfaction with the prevailing approach relying on individual litigation (Conley, 2014;Deakin et al, 2012;Hepple, 2012;Kahn and Meehan, 1992;Rubery and Grimshaw, 2015). The new model, as outlined in the 2001 Hepple report, rested on three basic principles: strong incentives for internal scrutiny by organizations; engagement with stakeholders; and an independent enforcement agency with the ability to apply deterrent sanctions if voluntarism fails (Hepple, 2012: 65; see also Fredman, 2008;Harrington, 2001;Hepple, 2011a). Responding to the Hepple report's recommendations, the Labour Party pledged support for a single equality bill in its 2005 manifesto, but it took another two years for draft texts to be prepared and opened to consultation.…”
Section: Policy Change Under Labour (1997-2010)mentioning
confidence: 99%