2016
DOI: 10.5751/es-08886-210417
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Making sense of climate change: orientations to adaptation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(33 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because there are no responses that can be perceived as obviously better than others, SenseMaker® reduces social desirability bias, and because participants interpret their own narratives using a series of pre-defined questions, the researchers' interpretation bias is also reduced. Though relatively new, SenseMaker® has emerged in recent academic literature as a valuable tool for data collection in studies related to ecology (Milne 2015), climate change (Lynam and Walker 2016), and global health (Bakhache et al 2017). Our current analysis examines data from a larger SenseMaker® study conducted in July-August 2016 exploring the experiences of Syrian girls in Lebanon (Bartels et al 2018).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because there are no responses that can be perceived as obviously better than others, SenseMaker® reduces social desirability bias, and because participants interpret their own narratives using a series of pre-defined questions, the researchers' interpretation bias is also reduced. Though relatively new, SenseMaker® has emerged in recent academic literature as a valuable tool for data collection in studies related to ecology (Milne 2015), climate change (Lynam and Walker 2016), and global health (Bakhache et al 2017). Our current analysis examines data from a larger SenseMaker® study conducted in July-August 2016 exploring the experiences of Syrian girls in Lebanon (Bartels et al 2018).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finding shared meaning about climate change can be complicated because climate meanings are construed differently by different people, and these constructs have changed over time (Breakwell 2010;Esbjorn-Hargens 2010;Hochachka 2019;Lynam 2012Lynam , 2014Lynam , 2019Lynam and Walker 2016). Scholars in the mental models literature emphasize the need to, "unpack the elements that make up the construct of climate change" (Breakwell 2010, p. 859).…”
Section: Towards a Psychosocial Manner Of Climate Engagementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of recent papers discuss applications-and potential perils-of topic modeling in social science and environmental science research (Grimmer & Stewart, 2013;Grubert & Algee-Hewitt, 2017;Hillard, Purpura, & Wilkerson, 2008;Quinn, Monroe, Colaresi, Crespin, & Radev, 2010;Vilares & He, 2017;Wiedemann, 2013;Wilkerson & Casas, 2017). Nonetheless, topic modeling has barely permeated the climate change literature, with the majority of existing examples limited to studies that use social media data to analyze coverage of climate change issues (Cody, Reagan, Mitchell, Dodds, & Danforth, 2015;Jang & Hart, 2015;Kirilenko & Stepchenkova, 2014;Williams, McMurray, Kurz, & Hugo, 2015), including skepticism and belief about climate change (Boussalis & Coan, 2016;Elgesem, Steskal, & Diakopoulos, 2015;Farrell, 2016), and social representations of adaptation (Lynam, 2016;Lynam & Walker, 2016). Applications of topic modeling for adaptation research are thus largely unexplored, despite the potential to expand text-based analysis to much larger scales than is currently possible.…”
Section: This Article Is Categorized Undermentioning
confidence: 99%