Jonas van der Straeten and Mariya PetrovaIn 1963, the journal Building and Architecture in Uzbekistan printed an arranged photo of four urban planners engaged in an animated conversation about an architectural model in front of them. 1 This model displayed the prospective city centre of Samarkand after its socialist transformation. In the model, the city's old Islamic neighbourhoods had been entirely demolished and replaced by multistorey, prefabricated residential buildings that lined roads radiating from the historical Registan complex. These neighbourhoods of the Old City, known as mahallas, had long been a thorn in the side of Soviet planners -symbolically and materially the narrow alleyways and mud-brick houses stood in the way of the city's modernisation. Now, after having barely changed in appearance for several hundred years -throughout half a century of Russian colonial administration and thirty years of Soviet Stalinist rule -the mahallas were set to finally give way to the rational urban planning of the Khrushchev era. This model of the new city centre, however, never became reality, owing to resource constraints and controversies over the final concept for its reconstruction. 2 Ultimately, the mahallas would even survive the mass housing campaign that started in the late 1950s. The overall vision of an all-out modernisation of Samarkand remained confined to a handful of micro-districts (mikrorayons) on the outskirts of the city. Until the collapse of the Soviet Union and beyond, Samarkand would large-