2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2008.02.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Making Reform Work: Institutions, Dispositions, and the Improving Health of Bangladesh

Abstract: We examine whether local governance can improve social development empirically, using good and bad cases of public health outcomes in Bangladesh. We explore the institutional underpinnings of service provision, digging down beneath the "rules of the game" to analyze the beliefs, understandings and dispositions that drive social behavior.Changes in deep social attitudes led to improvements in social indicators. Regional variation in health outcomes is explained by the presence or absence of a dense web of relat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These reforms decentralized power and resources from central government to division, district, sub-district, and union levels, bringing forth a new era of decentralized government. In so doing, they took government "closer to the people", and opened many new spaces for Bangladesh's vibrant civil society to participate in local decision-making (Faguet and Ali 2009). It is nonetheless important to note that decentralization in Bangladesh falls short of the standard set in other countries, such as India, Colombia and Bolivia, in terms of both the quantity of resources, and the scope of public authority devolved.…”
Section: Decentralization In Bangladeshmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These reforms decentralized power and resources from central government to division, district, sub-district, and union levels, bringing forth a new era of decentralized government. In so doing, they took government "closer to the people", and opened many new spaces for Bangladesh's vibrant civil society to participate in local decision-making (Faguet and Ali 2009). It is nonetheless important to note that decentralization in Bangladesh falls short of the standard set in other countries, such as India, Colombia and Bolivia, in terms of both the quantity of resources, and the scope of public authority devolved.…”
Section: Decentralization In Bangladeshmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Faguet and Ali's (2009) findings from Bangladesh support the importance of voice and exit in making local government responsive Channa and Faguet's (2012). survey of international experiments in decentralization provides evidence on the importance of electoral exit as a tool for motivating public officials.…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…In other low-income countries, decentralized expenditure has been shown to improve health outcomes (Faguet and Ali 2009). Does this hold in Ethiopia?…”
Section: Box 31 Ethiopia's Health Extension Program and Health Extenmentioning
confidence: 99%