2015
DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201400302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Making proteomics data accessible and reusable: Current state of proteomics databases and repositories

Abstract: Compared to other data-intensive disciplines such as genomics, public deposition and storage of MS-based proteomics, data are still less developed due to, among other reasons, the inherent complexity of the data and the variety of data types and experimental workflows. In order to address this need, several public repositories for MS proteomics experiments have been developed, each with different purposes in mind. The most established resources are the Global Proteome Machine Database (GPMDB), PeptideAtlas, an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
138
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 173 publications
(139 citation statements)
references
References 141 publications
0
138
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More specific databases have also been established, related to: diseases, for example TBDB for tuberculosis 9; organisms, for example ProteomicsDB 10 and the Human Proteome Map 11 for the human proteome, and pep2pro for Arabidopsis 12; or subproteomes, for example CSF‐PR 13 for cerebrospinal fluid or TOPPR 14 and TopFIND 15 for in vivo cleaved proteins. For a comprehensive overview of the current proteomics databases and repositories, please see Perez‐Riverol et al 16.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More specific databases have also been established, related to: diseases, for example TBDB for tuberculosis 9; organisms, for example ProteomicsDB 10 and the Human Proteome Map 11 for the human proteome, and pep2pro for Arabidopsis 12; or subproteomes, for example CSF‐PR 13 for cerebrospinal fluid or TOPPR 14 and TopFIND 15 for in vivo cleaved proteins. For a comprehensive overview of the current proteomics databases and repositories, please see Perez‐Riverol et al 16.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And also researchers have different interest and research projects on proteomics data. 48 And one of the major challenges of global proteomic studies that we have faced with is the missing data, because many statistical approaches are not sufficient since they require complete datasets. 49 However, the importance of the data standardization, storage and sharing publicly has been increased.…”
Section: Proteomics Databasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proteome Central has metadata associated with datasets [PRIDE and MassIVE for MS/MS data, PASSEL for SRM data, or Peptide Atlas for reprocessed original PX datasets]. 48 PRIDE 52 has peptide/protein identifications including PTMs, expression values, the analyzed mass spectra, and the related metadata. PRIDE supports both complete and partial submissions and data are stored as originally analyzed by the researchers.…”
Section: Proteomics Databasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations