2019
DOI: 10.1111/acem.13680
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Making Promotion Count: The Gender Perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(10 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Institutional policies related to promotion or advancement may inherently disadvantage women and are likely exacerbated by implicit bias and stereotyping. [9][10][11] There are an insufficient number of women in current leadership positions, resulting in fewer mentors and role models for women earlier in their career. 9 Women are less likely to be involved in early academic activities, such as presenting at grand rounds.…”
Section: Backg Rou N Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Institutional policies related to promotion or advancement may inherently disadvantage women and are likely exacerbated by implicit bias and stereotyping. [9][10][11] There are an insufficient number of women in current leadership positions, resulting in fewer mentors and role models for women earlier in their career. 9 Women are less likely to be involved in early academic activities, such as presenting at grand rounds.…”
Section: Backg Rou N Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 Reasons for advancement and leadership pipeline failures for women in academic EM, as well as other fields of medicine, are multifactorial and include: (1) disadvantageous institutional policies related to promotion and advancement; (2) insufficient numbers of successful women leader mentors and role models; and (3) lack of family-friendly policies, which may impact all genders but often women disproportionately (e.g., family leave, breast-feeding support, emergency child-care). [13][14][15] Leadership roles are currently held predominantly by men, which risks perpetuating implicit bias and gender stereotyping toward hiring other men leaders. In addition, widespread gender-based discrimination and sexual harassment experienced by women in medicine are well documented, including in EM, 16,17 and are linked to inequities in career advancement and attrition.…”
Section: Backg Rou N Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Open discussion regarding promotion should be initiated early in the recruitment process and revisited at regular intervals after hiring. 9 , 10 The department and faculty member should be in sync regarding the value, criteria, and expected timelines for promotion. The Academy for Women in Academic Emergency Medicine (AWAEM)’s Toolkit provides resources for departments to assist faculty in meeting promotion metrics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 23 During the creation of project teams, the selection of more than one URiM faculty or woman can alleviate additional pressures that stem from fears that failure will reinforce preexisting stereotypes or prejudices. 9 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%