2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.tele.2017.05.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Making (in) the smart city: The emergence of makerspaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
49
0
7

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
49
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, child-centeredness can be levered to proscribe what is developmentally appropriate in ways that restrict children's access to knowledge and ways of coming to know, as a means of protecting them from difficult issues and everyday events. The makerspace movement aligns with child-centeredness in its commitment to enabling users to pursue their own passions (Hsu, Baldwin, & Ching, 2017), but its roots lie not in an individualized agenda of self-improvement but in a participatory, democratic, and commons-oriented vision (Vasilis, Vasilis, & Wolfgang, 2017). In relation to Rogoff's (2003) second plane of analysis (relational), in this paper we argue that the maker movement has the potential to contribute to contemporary theories that place children's prior experiences and funds of knowledge (Moll et al, 1992) at the heart of relational pedagogical practice.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, child-centeredness can be levered to proscribe what is developmentally appropriate in ways that restrict children's access to knowledge and ways of coming to know, as a means of protecting them from difficult issues and everyday events. The makerspace movement aligns with child-centeredness in its commitment to enabling users to pursue their own passions (Hsu, Baldwin, & Ching, 2017), but its roots lie not in an individualized agenda of self-improvement but in a participatory, democratic, and commons-oriented vision (Vasilis, Vasilis, & Wolfgang, 2017). In relation to Rogoff's (2003) second plane of analysis (relational), in this paper we argue that the maker movement has the potential to contribute to contemporary theories that place children's prior experiences and funds of knowledge (Moll et al, 1992) at the heart of relational pedagogical practice.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The forward-looking development approach to a smart city considers issues such as awareness, flexibility, transformability, synergy, individuality, self-decisiveness, and strategic behavior [22]. The main point of smart city development is improving people's lives, efficiency, and sustainability [23,24]. Beginning in the early 90s with increasing interest in the relationship of urban development based on International Telecommunication Union perspectives will be central in the development and operation of the future city [25].…”
Section: Smart Citymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La popularización del movimiento maker se ha producido a escala internacional gracias al efecto red (Farrell y Klemperer, 2007) que se produce en Internet y al papel que desempeñan las comunidades on-line en el espacio virtual (Rheingold, 1996), pero también a través de la difusión de innumerables espacios físicos donde se realizan actividades orientadas a interactuar con este tipo de tecnologías no propietarias y de bajo coste (Niaros, Kostakis y Drechsler, 2017). Este es el caso de espacios como Fab Labs, Makerspaces y Hackerspaces, los cuales permiten a sus usuarios desarrollar proyectos colaborativos de fabricación digital o acceder a cursos, seminarios y jornadas donde se puede aprender a dominar las máquinas indicadas y adquirir los conocimientos necesarios para desarrollar las capacidades adecuadas.…”
Section: Espacios Y Laboratoriosunclassified
“…Además el 97% poseen una carrera universitaria y el 80% ha recibido alguna formación de tercer grado (Leonard, 2013, 26 de julio). Las cifras en Reino Unido y China son bastante similares con un 80% y un 77% de varones que se autodefinen como makers (Niaros et al, 2017). A pesar de que estos espacios de fabricación digital se han desarrollado en un considerable y diverso número de localizaciones, estos números nos hacen preguntarnos si no se están cometiendo los mismos errores que en otros modelos que fomentan la ciencia, la tecnología y la innovación o si simplemente son un reflejo de las desigualdades que se proyectan a través de modelos culturales sesgados y tan ampliamente difundidos como el de Silicon Valley.…”
Section: Oportunidades Mitos Y Retosunclassified