2013
DOI: 10.1002/wrna.1156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Making ends meet: coordination between RNA 3′‐end processing and transcription initiation

Abstract: RNA polymerase II (RNAPII)-mediated gene transcription initiates at promoters and ends at terminators. Transcription termination is intimately connected to 3'-end processing of the produced RNA and already when loaded at the promoter, RNAPII starts to become configured for this downstream event. Conversely, RNAPII is 'reset' as part of the 3'-end processing/termination event, thus preparing the enzyme for its next round of transcription--possibly on the same gene. There is both direct and circumstantial eviden… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 145 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CPA factors have been detected in promoter regions (Glover-Cutter et al, 2008), where they interact with general transcription factors (Dantonel et al, 1997), transcriptional activators (Calvo and Manley, 2001; Nagaike et al, 2011) and the Pol II CTD (McCracken et al, 1997). Functional interactions between transcriptional initiation and termination have been documented (Andersen et al, 2013), for example, impaired 3′ processing can diminish initiation rates at yeast and human promoters (Mapendano et al, 2010; Zhang et al, 2012). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CPA factors have been detected in promoter regions (Glover-Cutter et al, 2008), where they interact with general transcription factors (Dantonel et al, 1997), transcriptional activators (Calvo and Manley, 2001; Nagaike et al, 2011) and the Pol II CTD (McCracken et al, 1997). Functional interactions between transcriptional initiation and termination have been documented (Andersen et al, 2013), for example, impaired 3′ processing can diminish initiation rates at yeast and human promoters (Mapendano et al, 2010; Zhang et al, 2012). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since CPSF100 is associated with coiled bodies it should function in RNA biogenesis (Schul et al ., ). CPSF100 was reported to interact with transcription initiation factors that are possibly involved in transcription initiation in eukaryotic cells (Dantonel et al ., ; Wang et al ., ; Andersen et al ., ). RNA splicing subunit U2 snRNP is stably associated with CPSF100, and some splicing factors can be co‐pulled down with CPSF100 (Kyburz et al ., ; Pandya‐Jones, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Other mechanisms could be important, such as preformation of sub complexes [35] and local recycling. The latter has been suggested for RNA pol II through coordination between transcription and 3′ end processing [36, 37]. Another way of coordinating interactions between the transcript and specific proteins is via the RNA pol II elongation complex.…”
Section: Active Genes—optimal Nuclear Microenvironments For Transcripmentioning
confidence: 99%