Making Claims that Matter: Heuristics for Theoretical and Social Impact in Qualitative Research

Abstract

Scholar activists draw on a variety of theoretical, methodological, and practical tools for creating and sustaining social justice. We argue that data analysis—in addition to research design, participation, and community engagement—can be leveraged to engage in scholarship for social good. This essay contributes to that effort by offering a set of data analytic heuristic devices for qualitative researchers. These heuristic devices include community cocktail party, conjecturing claims, Jeopardy research questions, phronetic claims, carrying claims, and tightening claims. We outline each heuristic device’s use, purpose, underlying philosophical commitments, and how it aids analytic thinking that serves the pursuit of justice. Using these devices provides opportunities for making claims that matter and strengthening the impact of qualitative research.

Effect of Educational Program about Resonant Leadership on Nurse Managers' Knowledge and Practices

“…Along with the current study findings, Huffman and Tracy (30) found that significant improvement was detected in nurse managers' resonant leadership practice after program implementation there with their nurses. Also, Brouer and Harris (31) stated that resonant leaders are aware of the power of using emotional intelligence to persuade staff members to be more dedicated to their work and the organization's objectives.…”

Collective Emotion During Collective Trauma: A Metaphor Analysis of the COVID-19 Pandemic

“…During this process, two negative cases emerged (i.e., participant perspectives that diverged and opposed other participant perspectives). We conducted a negative case analysis for each of the negative cases to understand why their perspectives were unique to the other participants (Huffman & Tracy, 2018). Those analyses are included in the findings section.…”

Guidelines for conducting partnered research in applied psychology: An illustration from disability research in employment contexts

“…Partners should engage in a dialogue where each has equal opportunities to share their expertise on a topic of interest, identify information gaps, and generate specific questions. Drawing from multiple perspectives can enrich researchers' understanding of a problem by offering varying perspectives and building understanding of the context in which the problem occurs (Huffman & Tracy, 2018). In this process, the academic researcher plays a central role in bringing together the various partners' perspectives, injecting an evidence-base into the conversations, and translating ideas into formal research questions.…”