2022
DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2022-070872
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Making better use of natural experimental evaluation in population health

Abstract: Rather than arguing about the suitability of natural experimental methods to inform decisions we need to focus on refining their scope and design, say Peter Craig and colleagues Key messages• Natural experimental evaluations can provide useful information to guide decision making about interventions• Most discussion has focussed on what quantitative methods are suitable for natural experimental evaluations Key definitions and concepts remain contested and there is a lack of consensus about the circumstances in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(44 reference statements)
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the trade-off between bias and precision means that estimates are not necessarily more credible than those from any other design ( 42 ). As well as other randomized controlled designs, the importance of alternative evaluation designs is recognized in the recently updated UK Medical Research Council guidance for complex interventions which explicitly recognizes the need to consider a wider range of designs than just randomized controlled trials ( 35 ), including natural experiment designs ( 65 ).…”
Section: Possible Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the trade-off between bias and precision means that estimates are not necessarily more credible than those from any other design ( 42 ). As well as other randomized controlled designs, the importance of alternative evaluation designs is recognized in the recently updated UK Medical Research Council guidance for complex interventions which explicitly recognizes the need to consider a wider range of designs than just randomized controlled trials ( 35 ), including natural experiment designs ( 65 ).…”
Section: Possible Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The challenges in using RCTs to evaluate complex interventions to overcome social determinants of health are well described, 8 , 9 and most strategic decisions—particularly in Public Health—are made without the benefit of evidence from an RCT. So, what else constitutes acceptable evidence?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Otherwise, there is a risk of a blurring of intended target populations, outcomes, and analytical approaches. 9 , 56 Alongside the robust approaches to assess causal inference we have described, a published a priori protocol adds validity to the findings and has the potential to broaden the acceptability of NES as admissible evidence for causation. For reference, a detailed framework of what to include in the protocol has been recently published.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Going forward, alcohol marketing restrictions should be accompanied by comprehensive evaluation programmes, making best use of naturalistic experimental designs that are well established as an appropriate way of evaluating the health impacts of policies, programmes and interventions [10]. These programmes should be guided by theories of change and logic models, involving structured identification of the key outcomes anticipated from the restrictions, the indicators needed to examine them (including differences among subpopulations) and the data required to ensure robust evaluation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%