2019
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.122.244502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Making a Simple A+BC Reaction Oscillate by Coupling to Hydrodynamic Effect

Abstract: We present a new mechanism through which chemical oscillations and waves can be induced in batch conditions with a simple A þ B → C reaction in the absence of any nonlinear chemical feedback or external trigger. Two reactants A and B, initially separated in space, react upon diffusive contact and the product actively fuels in situ convective Marangoni flows by locally increasing the surface tension at the mixing interface. These flows combine in turn with the reaction-diffusion dynamics, inducing damped spatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
57
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
57
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Reacting fronts that propagate through a moving fluid are important parts of many systems in science and engineering that are of intense current interest [1][2][3]. This includes geophysical problems such as the lock-exchange instability [4,5] of oceanic and atmospheric flows, the buoyancy and surface tension driven flows of chemical fronts [3,[6][7][8][9], the propagation of polymerization fronts [10], the rich spatiotemporal dynamics of forest fires [11,12], and the improved properties of combustion of pre-mixed gases in a turbulent fluid flow [13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reacting fronts that propagate through a moving fluid are important parts of many systems in science and engineering that are of intense current interest [1][2][3]. This includes geophysical problems such as the lock-exchange instability [4,5] of oceanic and atmospheric flows, the buoyancy and surface tension driven flows of chemical fronts [3,[6][7][8][9], the propagation of polymerization fronts [10], the rich spatiotemporal dynamics of forest fires [11,12], and the improved properties of combustion of pre-mixed gases in a turbulent fluid flow [13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the treatment presented in this paper consists of three stages: (a) For a N (= 2 j + 1) level system, we consider the measurements that project the state of the system onto one of the N subspaces. In other words, we consider the case of a complete degeneracy-breaking measurement [67], as initially proposed by von-Neumann [74,75]. (b) Subsequently, for our analysis, in order to take into account the coarsening of individual measurement outcomes, we club the different outcomes into two groups.…”
Section: Concluding Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This observable quantity Q is measured at instances t 1 , t 2 and t 3 (t 1 < t 2 < t 3 ). Note that this type of grouping scheme has been used earlier in the treatments of the quantum violation of macrorealism [41,67,70]. Note that the above measurement scheme has been critically reexamined in the context of Leggett-Garg inequality by Kumari et al [72].…”
Section: Multilevel Spin System and The Measurement Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It was shown in [27] that this bound holds for systems with arbitrary (but finite) number of levels, as long as the measurements are given by just two projectors [28][29][30][31]. In the limit N → ∞, LGI can be violated up to its maximum algebraic sum [32].…”
Section: Leggett Garg Inequalitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%