Making a difference? The use (and abuse) of diversity management at the UK’s elite law firms

Abstract

A B S T R AC TThe UK's elite law firms have recently seen a shift from talking about equality of opportunity alone to the adoption of a diversity discourse as well. This article examines this transition for what it can tell us about the value of diversity strategies as a means for widening access to the corporate legal profession on the basis of social class, focusing on five elite law firms based in the City of London. A number of studies have demonstrated how cultural practices within the legal sector maintain exclusionary mechanisms based on class. There has been less attention to how this is sustained within an amended institutional framework which outwardly 'celebrates' difference. This research suggests that though diversity strategies do little to change organisational cultures, those that recognise both the depth of professional prejudice within the sector and the reality of educational inequality across the UK may prove relatively progressive nonetheless. K E Y WO R D Sclass / diversity management / equal opportunities / ethnicity / inequality / law firm

Diversity and professionalism in the Big Four firms: Expectation, celebration and weapon in the battle for talent

“…The rewards of professional work should be shared out amongst those who have the ability to do it, for the wider public good. Equality discourses in turn, build on older notions of civil rights and procedures, ensuring everyone is equal at the beginning of the race, with a focus on individual merit (Ashley, 2010).…”

“…This leads to the paradox of diversity and difference. If we are all valued for our uniqueness, we become homogenised through our differences (Ashley, 2010). Diversity is a malleable term (Jewson & Mason, 1986;Jones & Clements, 2002).…”

Differentiation and discrimination: Understanding social class and social exclusion in leading law firms

“…(The Lawyer, 2011) However, this article argues that whilst socially undesirable, discriminating on the basis of social class is considered a rational commercial strategy by most leading law firms, but particularly those seeking to improve their image in order to charge higher fees. As such, the use of the business case as a key driver for equality may be deeply flawed (Ashley, 2010;Noon, 2007). Before discussing these issues in further detail, the following section outlines the research design.…”

Gender essentialism and occupational segregation in insolvency practice

“…Other investigations suggest that human resource managers may define diversity by reference to the socio-demographic traits of hypothetical individuals and ascribe these 'essences' to groups (Zanoni & Janssens, 2003). In law firms diversity agendas can formalize perceptions of difference founded on stereotypical assumptions (Ashley, 2010). Progressive measures taken in the name of diversity, such as the creation of "mommy tracks' and mentoring schemes for female employees, effectively reproduce notions of gender-based segregation (Kersten, 2000).…”