2020
DOI: 10.1109/access.2020.3044723
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Makeup Presentation Attacks: Review and Detection Performance Benchmark

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(75 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The vulnerability of many face recognition systems has been recently assessed to facial makeup presentation in [32]. Furthermore, the same research team presented a facial retouch detection method based on analysis of photo response non-uniformity (PRNU) in [33] and conducted a review and benchmarking for makeup presentation attacks methods in [34].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vulnerability of many face recognition systems has been recently assessed to facial makeup presentation in [32]. Furthermore, the same research team presented a facial retouch detection method based on analysis of photo response non-uniformity (PRNU) in [33] and conducted a review and benchmarking for makeup presentation attacks methods in [34].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In physical face attacks, a.k.a. Presentation Attacks (PAs), real subjects are often impersonated using artefacts such as photographs, videos, makeup, and masks [13,29,38,39]. Face recognition systems are known to be vulnerable against these attacks unless proper detection methods are implemented [14,19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A presentation attack aims to subvert the face recognition system by presenting a facial biometric artifact, including a printed photo, the electronic display of a facial photo, replaying video using an electronic display, and 3D face masks [7]. It has recently been demonstrated that makeup can also be abused to launch presentation attacks [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%