Spun-knots (respectively, spinning tori) in S 4 made from classical 1-knots compose an important class of spherical 2-knots (respectively, embedded tori) contained in S 4 . Virtual 1-knots are generalizations of classical 1-knots. We generalize these constructions to the virtual 1-knot case by using what we call, in this paper, the spinning construction of a submanifold. The construction proceeds as follows: It has been known that there is a consistent way to make an embedded circle C contained in (a closed oriented surface F )×(a closed interval [0, 1]) from any virtual 1-knot K. Embed F in S 4 by an embedding map f . Let F also denote f (F ). We can regard the tubular neighborhood ofThus we obtain an embedded torus Q ⊂ S 4 . We prove the following: The embedding type Q in S 4 depends only on K, and does not depend on f . Furthermore, the submanifolds, Q and the embedded torus made from K, defined by Satoh's method, of S 4 are isotopic.We generalize this construction in the virtual 1-knot case, and we also succeed to make a consistent construction of one-dimensional-higher tubes from any virtual 2dimensional knot. Note that Satoh's method says nothing about the virtual 2-knot case. Rourke's interpretation of Satoh's method is that one puts 'fiber-circles' on each point of each virtual 1-knot diagram. If there is no virtual branch point in a virtual 2-knot diagram, our way gives such fiber-circles to each point of the virtual 2-knot diagram. Furthermore we prove the following: If a virtual 2-knot diagram α has a virtual branch point, α cannot be covered by such fiber-circles.We obtain a new equivalence relation, the E-equivalence relation of the set of virtual 2-knot diagrams, that is much connected with the welded equivalence relation and our spinning construction. We prove that there are virtual 2-knot diagrams, J and K, that are virtually nonequivalent but are E-equivalent.Although Rourke claimed that two virtual 1-knot diagrams α and β are fiberwise equivalent if and only if α and β are welded equivalent, we state that this claim is wrong. We prove that two virtual 1-knot diagrams α and β are fiberwise equivalent if and only if α and β are rotational welded equivalent (the definiton of rotational welded equivalence is given in the body of the paper).