1994
DOI: 10.1142/s0217732394000460
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MAJORANA-LIKE (j, 0) ⊕ (0, j) REPRESENTATION SPACES: CONSTRUCTION AND PHYSICAL INTERPRETATION

Abstract: We present a formalism that extends the Majorana-construction to arbitrary spin (j, 0) ⊕ (0, j) representation spaces. For the example case of spin-1, a wave equation satisfied by the Majoranalike (1, 0) ⊕ (0, 1) spinors is constructed and its physical content explored. The (j, 0) ⊕ (0, j) Majorana-construct is found to possess an unusual classical and quantum field theoretic structure.Relevance of our formalism to parity violation, hadronic phenomenologies, and grand unified field theories is briefly pointed … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It seems to have remained unasked as to what effect the choice for the helicity structure of the Majorana spinors has on the physical content of the resulting field, and why the same spinors should not be asked to satisfy an appropriate completeness relation in the (1/2, 0) ⊕ (0, 1/2) representation space. In the context of generalization to higher spins, a preliminary exploration of these issues emerged in [40,41]. The unexpected results that we present here arose when the present authors decided to take the research notes contained in [42] to their logical conclusion.…”
Section: Genesis: From the Majorana Field To A Call For A New Dark Mamentioning
confidence: 84%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It seems to have remained unasked as to what effect the choice for the helicity structure of the Majorana spinors has on the physical content of the resulting field, and why the same spinors should not be asked to satisfy an appropriate completeness relation in the (1/2, 0) ⊕ (0, 1/2) representation space. In the context of generalization to higher spins, a preliminary exploration of these issues emerged in [40,41]. The unexpected results that we present here arose when the present authors decided to take the research notes contained in [42] to their logical conclusion.…”
Section: Genesis: From the Majorana Field To A Call For A New Dark Mamentioning
confidence: 84%
“…With respect to the Dirac dual, the Elko have an imaginary bi-orthogonal norm as was already noted in [40,41]. For the sake of a ready reference, this is recorded explicitly in appendix B.1.…”
Section: A New Dual For Elkomentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Once again, one finds that neutral (1/2, 0) ⊕ (0, 1/2) representation space carries distinct, and different, structure under the transformations of C, P, and T. The reader is referred to Refs. [14,15,19,20].…”
Section: The Quantum-induced Cpt Structure Of Space-timementioning
confidence: 99%