Proceedings of the 3rd Unconventional Resources Technology Conference 2015
DOI: 10.15530/urtec-2015-2154393
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Major Obstacles in Production From Hydraulically Re-Fractured Shale Formations: Reservoir Pressure Depletion and Pore Blockage by the Fracturing Fluid

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our recommendations mainly focus on addressing the possible chemical processes resulting from acid treatment because of access to geochemical data from both the injection formation and neighboring Madison Limestone formation. We also investigate several other possible explanations of the pressure behavior, including water blocking (Bahrami et al, 2012;Assiri and Miskimins, 2014;Haddad et al, 2015), gouge production (Sammis et al, 1987;Marone and Scholz, 1989;Rutqvist and Stephansson, 2003), and perforation plugging (Civan, 2015) and find that these are unlikely to have occured and/or difficult to properly verify given the currently available data. Therefore, we suggest that future GCS projects (1) include a geochemical study using baseline water chemistry prior to acid treatment to predict potential precipitation or (2) consider alternative stimulation fluids to HCl.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our recommendations mainly focus on addressing the possible chemical processes resulting from acid treatment because of access to geochemical data from both the injection formation and neighboring Madison Limestone formation. We also investigate several other possible explanations of the pressure behavior, including water blocking (Bahrami et al, 2012;Assiri and Miskimins, 2014;Haddad et al, 2015), gouge production (Sammis et al, 1987;Marone and Scholz, 1989;Rutqvist and Stephansson, 2003), and perforation plugging (Civan, 2015) and find that these are unlikely to have occured and/or difficult to properly verify given the currently available data. Therefore, we suggest that future GCS projects (1) include a geochemical study using baseline water chemistry prior to acid treatment to predict potential precipitation or (2) consider alternative stimulation fluids to HCl.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%