2003
DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2003.0079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Major histocompatibility complex and mate choice in sand lizards

Abstract: In mice and man, females prefer males with a major histocompatibility complex (MHC) genotype different to their own. We tested whether this phenomenon also occurs in the Swedish sand lizard (Lacerta agilis). Females in a laboratory experiment preferred to associate with odour samples obtained from more distantly related males at the MHC class 1 loci. Data on free-ranging lizards suggest that associations between males and females are nonrandom with respect to MHC genotype. However, male spatial distribution an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
197
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 227 publications
(204 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
6
197
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In other lizard species, genetic compatibility (based on MHC dissimilarity) was the main characteristic that females selected from the scent of a male (Olsson et al 2003). However, in the large and widespread populations of Iberian wall lizards, the probability of finding genetically incompatible males may be low, and, then, it might be more important for females to select males' quality per se.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In other lizard species, genetic compatibility (based on MHC dissimilarity) was the main characteristic that females selected from the scent of a male (Olsson et al 2003). However, in the large and widespread populations of Iberian wall lizards, the probability of finding genetically incompatible males may be low, and, then, it might be more important for females to select males' quality per se.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each trial lasted 6 h (from 09.00 h GMT, shortly after females appeared from refuges, and until 15.00 h GMT, when females hid again), Females were monitored each 15 min (25 scans) from a hidden point. If a female was located on a tile with the paper strip, she was designated as having chosen temporarily that particular paper, whereas if she was located outside of the tiles she was designated as having made no choice (for details of a similar procedure see Martín & Ló pez 2000;Ló pez et al , 2003Olsson et al 2003). The paper on which a female spent greater than 50% of her time (excluding time in the no choice area) was designed as the preferred paper in that trial.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Twenty-six out of 37 individuals examined (frequency = 0.73) had optimal numbers of MHC 'true' alleles per individual with 13 (frequency = 0.351) containing three variants per individual, eight (frequency = 0.216) containing four variants per individual, and six (frequency = 0.167) containing five variants per individual. Despite lack of specific explanation for the optimal gene copy numbers in E. multiocellata, a possible scenario, which needs to be tested, is that individuals with optimal levels of diversity might suffer least from parasitization, as has been proposed for many vertebrates such as sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus) (Wegner et al, 2003), sand lizard (Lacerta agilis) (Olsson et al, 2003), house sparrow (Passer domesticus) (Griggio et al, 2011), and saltwater crocodile (Crocodylus porosus) (Jaratlerdsiri et al, 2012), which their mate choices favored offspring with an optimum number of MHC variants.…”
Section: Allelic Copy Number Variationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, birds are known to use chemical cues for navigation and orientation (Gagliardo et al 2008, Holland et al 2009), foraging (Nevitt 2008), and predator recognition (Amo et al 2008). Honey bees can track the scent produced by flowering plants to trace potential food sources (Beekman 2005), while animals such as lizards can distinguish mates of different genotypes based on odor (Olsson et al 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%