2020
DOI: 10.1007/s13246-020-00897-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Major depressive disorder assessment via enhanced k-nearest neighbor method and EEG signals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
39
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, it is difficult to partition the available EEG dataset of small sample size into a training dataset used for training classifiers and an independent test dataset of sufficient size. Due to this limitation, previous studies have only estimated the efficacy of their method in MDD detection by performing a k-fold CV on the entire EEG dataset, where k = 10 [10][11][12][13][14][15][16]18,19,22,25] or k = number of EEG samples [9,17,23] (i.e., leave-one-out (LOO)). Directly performing a 10-fold CV on the group of participants (i.e., partitioning the entire group into 10 folds, with no EEGs of the same participants appearing in different folds at the same time) is nearly impossible due to participant size limitations.…”
Section: Cross Validation Used In Previous Work: More Detailed Review and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is difficult to partition the available EEG dataset of small sample size into a training dataset used for training classifiers and an independent test dataset of sufficient size. Due to this limitation, previous studies have only estimated the efficacy of their method in MDD detection by performing a k-fold CV on the entire EEG dataset, where k = 10 [10][11][12][13][14][15][16]18,19,22,25] or k = number of EEG samples [9,17,23] (i.e., leave-one-out (LOO)). Directly performing a 10-fold CV on the group of participants (i.e., partitioning the entire group into 10 folds, with no EEGs of the same participants appearing in different folds at the same time) is nearly impossible due to participant size limitations.…”
Section: Cross Validation Used In Previous Work: More Detailed Review and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Saeedi M et al [41] aimed to the prediction by a three-step procedure; feature extraction, feature selection, classification. For pre-processing operation, Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT) is employed to decompose EEG signals into detail and approximate coefficients by which thresholds that matched artifacts omitted.…”
Section: Deep Learning Methods For Depression Detection Using Eeg Signalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Saeedi M et al [42] aimed to the prediction by a three-step procedure; feature extraction, feature selection, classification. For pre-processing operation, Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT) employed to decompose EEG signals into detailed and approximate coefficients by which thresholds that matched artifacts omitted.…”
Section: Deep Learning Methods For Depression Detection Using Eeg Signalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Combined models of convolution neural network structure and LSTM blocks have obtained better results than other ones because these representations enjoyed the advantages of memorization capability of LSTM architecture and built-in feature extracting property of CNN constructions. Referring to reviewed studies, it can conclude that using some external methods and combining them with a deep learning structure will also give a significant accuracy, as this technique has been adopted by [42,51]. As it can perceive from the depiction, most studies have selected convolutional layer(s) to derive features as an end-to-end technique.…”
Section: Aq1: What Deep Learning Algorithms Have Been Used To Detect or Predict Depression?mentioning
confidence: 99%