2001
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0447.2001.00007.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Major demographic, social and economic factors associated to suicide rates in
Latvia 1980–98

Abstract: Demographic and socioeconomic factors could not explain sufficiently the rapid changes in suicide rates in Latvia during the years 1980-98; psychological factors also have to be considered.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

5
28
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
5
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…35, p = .002), male (β = .31, p = .006), and female (β = .33, p = .001) suicide rates. 5 Suicide rates were also significantly higher in regions with a larger rural population, which is consistent with prior research both in the West and in former Soviet nations (Rancans, Renberg and Jacobsson 2001). None of the indicators of the strength of social institutions appeared to be related to the spatial distribution of Russian suicide rates, which may be partially explained by the findings of Kowalski, Faupel and Starr (1987), who found that measures of social structure may only be helpful in explaining suicide rates in metropolitan areas, not in rural settings.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…35, p = .002), male (β = .31, p = .006), and female (β = .33, p = .001) suicide rates. 5 Suicide rates were also significantly higher in regions with a larger rural population, which is consistent with prior research both in the West and in former Soviet nations (Rancans, Renberg and Jacobsson 2001). None of the indicators of the strength of social institutions appeared to be related to the spatial distribution of Russian suicide rates, which may be partially explained by the findings of Kowalski, Faupel and Starr (1987), who found that measures of social structure may only be helpful in explaining suicide rates in metropolitan areas, not in rural settings.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…On the basis of Latvian data from 1980 to 1998 data, rising suicide rates in Latvia were paralleled by declining GDP and increasing unemployment until 1993. 12 This association disappeared between 1993 and 1998. A German study (1981 to 1989) found that increasing suicide rates correlated with increasing unemployment and decreasing real income.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The increase in suicide mortality from the mid-1960s to 1984 has been linked to psycho-social factors such as the suppression of individuality and individual thought (Värnik & Wasserman, 1992) as well as to the economic stagnation of the Brezhnev era (Gilinskii & Rumyantseva, 2004). The sharp decrease that occurred from 1984 has been widely associated with the large reduction in alcohol consumption that occurred during Gorbachev's antialcohol campaign (Shkolnikov & Nemtsov, 1997;Nemtsov, 2003), possibly in conjunction with the processes of glasnost and perestroika and the popular optimism created by the political thaw at that time (Gilinskii & Rumyantseva, 2004;Rancans, Salander Renberg, & Jacobsson, 2001;Wasserman & Värnik, 1998a). In contrast, the dramatic increase in suicide mortality following the break-up of the Soviet Union has been attributed to rapid social change producing ''anomic'' societal effects (Mäkinen, 2000;Pridemore, Chamlin, & Cochran, 2007), in conjunction with deteriorating macroeconomic conditions (Brainerd, 2001), increased levels of stress (Mäkinen, 2000), and growing alcohol consumption (Nemtsov, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%