2013
DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2013.818844
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Major Constraints and Possible Solutions for Performance Management in Korea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We argue that employees with a strong sense of exchange will be more satisfied with their pay in organizations with a higher reliance on performance pay, a hypothesis that is tested using data gathered from a large survey of South Korean central government workers. Performance pay has been introduced throughout Korean central government (P. S. Kim & Hong, 2013; Lee & Moon, 2012; OECD, 2017a), making Korea a relevant context in which to explore this issue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We argue that employees with a strong sense of exchange will be more satisfied with their pay in organizations with a higher reliance on performance pay, a hypothesis that is tested using data gathered from a large survey of South Korean central government workers. Performance pay has been introduced throughout Korean central government (P. S. Kim & Hong, 2013; Lee & Moon, 2012; OECD, 2017a), making Korea a relevant context in which to explore this issue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For one, Korea has faced several challenges in the implementation of its NPM reforms, particularly as they relate to the extension of discretion to civil servants (Im 2013;Kim and Hong 2013). Unlike in the Weberian model, where authority is vested structurally within the formal organizational position rather than in the unique individual, in Korean public organizations it is more difficult to separate the individual from their organizational role.…”
Section: Change-oriented Behavior In Public Organizations and In The mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those in the lowest 10% receive zero performance bonus, and employees that fall into the middle category receive somewhere in between (Civil Service Commission 2007, in Lee and Moon 2012). In addition to pay, however, the significance of the performance evaluation has gradually become the most important criteria for promotion within public organizations (Kim and Hong 2013). As promotion and status are arguably the most important status-based criteria within public organizations (Im, Campbell, and Cha 2013), such a system serves to emphasize the importance of performance for employees.…”
Section: Merit Pay Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations