2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.09.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maize, sweet sorghum, and high biomass sorghum ethanol yield comparison on marginal soils in Midwest USA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The NRE of maize, as well as grain yield and biomass production, has increased over time with newer hybrids, suggesting that with greater yields and higher N rates, high NRE in sweet sorghum may be achieved through further genetic selection. Sweet sorghum yield can be greatly affected by weather and climate, as shown here and in Maw et al (2016) and (2017a). The weather in 2009 apparently negatively impacted N content, as indicated by the very low NRE, and ultimately resulted in low biomass yield.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The NRE of maize, as well as grain yield and biomass production, has increased over time with newer hybrids, suggesting that with greater yields and higher N rates, high NRE in sweet sorghum may be achieved through further genetic selection. Sweet sorghum yield can be greatly affected by weather and climate, as shown here and in Maw et al (2016) and (2017a). The weather in 2009 apparently negatively impacted N content, as indicated by the very low NRE, and ultimately resulted in low biomass yield.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Sorghum can be grown across most latitudes of the United States and is already known for its high water use efficiency and drought tolerance (Geng et al, 1989; Propheter et al, 2010; Wang et al, 2014), high radiation use efficiency (Houx and Fritschi, 2015), and flood tolerance (Houx et al, 2013; Promkhambut et al, 2011). It is a high‐yielding C 4 annual grass that can produce large amounts of stem juice sugars and lignocellulosic biomass when grown in the Midwest (Holou and Stevens, 2011; Houx and Fritschi, 2013; Maw et al, 2016, 2017a). Sweet sorghum has been shown to efficiently use soil mineral N as well as fertilizer N, and to translocate N within the plant (Wang et al, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By mid‐August, maize had transitioned into the senescence stage while both miscanthus and energy sorghum maintained high rates of GPP and ET through September (Figures 2c and 4b). The addition of lower peak growing season ET from energy sorghum compared to maize, despite the higher soil moisture in the energy sorghum plot that should promote higher ET, reflects the WUE and subsequent drought tolerance of energy sorghum (Mullet et al, 2014), which lends it to potential expansion across a wider climatic growing region than maize (Gelfand et al, 2013; Maw et al, 2017). While some studies have shown little difference in ET and WUE between maize and a hybrid energy sorghum–sudangrass variety (Roby et al, 2017), others have indicated energy sorghum's water demand is offset by its high productivity and thus WUE (Oikawa et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, a great interest in new species of energy crops has been observed all over Europe (An et al, 2018;Drazic et al, 2017;Haines et al, 2015;Jureková et al, 2015;Kalembasa and Symanowicz, 2003;Maw et al, 2017;Tumminello et al, 2018;Wang et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ha -1 also showed the possibilities of cultivating fodder galega as an energy crop. Therefore, the introduction of an additional plant, apart from Miscanthus sacchariflorus, Miscanthus x giganteus (Jeżowski et al, 2011;Maksimović et al, 2016); Sweet Sorghum, Maize, HBS (Maw et al, 2017); Sorghum hybrids (Pannacii and Bartolini, 2016); Salix spp., (Stolarski, 2008) and Sida hermaphrodita (Krzyżaniak et al, 2015) is recommended and related to the possibility of increasing biomass production, with a view to binding atmospheric N2. An additional benefit is the possibility of using ash from biomass combustion as a liming agent in agriculture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%