2004
DOI: 10.1097/00004669-200410000-00048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maintenance Model for Minimizing Risk and Optimizing Cost-effectiveness of Medical Equipment in Palestine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• Management and monitoring of training provided by manufacturers or technical staff including biomedical engineer or clinical engineer [14] The risk assessment was divided into four main areas: clinical function, failure avoidance probability, history of incidents and regulatory or manufacturer requirements. Devices would be evaluated on the aforementioned criteria and be assigned a score.…”
Section: Classification and Prioritization Of Medical Equipment For Maintenance Activitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Management and monitoring of training provided by manufacturers or technical staff including biomedical engineer or clinical engineer [14] The risk assessment was divided into four main areas: clinical function, failure avoidance probability, history of incidents and regulatory or manufacturer requirements. Devices would be evaluated on the aforementioned criteria and be assigned a score.…”
Section: Classification and Prioritization Of Medical Equipment For Maintenance Activitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence in the literature points that mathematical modeling is much more flexible than empirical approaches, and medical maintenance would benefit from optimization modeling [25]. Khalaf et al [26,27] proposed a mathematical model that adopted a mixed integer based approach maintenance scheduling technique a software maintainability for maintenance predication purposes was formulated based on both experience in software architecture development and haemodialysis machine architecture. The key performance indicators for the software design included maintainability, re-usability, safety, real-timeliness and demonstrability [28].…”
Section: Optimization Of Maintenance Strategy For Critical Medical Eqmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The last coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) pandemic (2020) might be the best demonstration of this fact, as hundreds of lives were lost and thousands more became critically ill as a direct result of the unavailability of the equipment required for diagnosis and treatment (mainly testing, respiratory aid and resuscitation devices), whether due to lack or failures. In developing countries, the situation is far worse, as the inoperative devices rate reaches 50% and sometimes up to 75% of the supplied equipment in normal conditions (Khalaf, 2004), regardless of the heavy workload associated with such pandemics and crises. This can get even more critical if the device ceases working while in use.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%