2019
DOI: 10.17531/ein.2019.2.6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maintenance management balanced scorecard approach for urban transport fleets

Abstract: Attending the important role of maintenance function in any production or service provider company, the measurement and assessment of maintenance performance is crucial for competitiveness and future survival. That situation is even more critical in urban transport fleets where some specific boundary conditions and special characteristics will affect maintenance policy and implementation. This paper presents a deep review of different studies worldwide to define the most proper and effective maintenance perfor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tsang et al (1999) introduce a holistic approach to establish maintenance performance measures using the well-known balanced scorecard, which translates a business unit's strategy around four perspectives: financial, customer, internal process, and learning and growth (Kaplan and Norton, 1996). In recent studies, various versions of the modified balanced scorecard have been developed for maintenance performance-related applications, focusing mainly on the inclusion of non-financial perspectives (Campos et al, 2017;Maci an et al, 2019;Sirin et al, 2020;Tanoto et al, 2022), and alignment with objectives and information systems (Campos et al, 2017). The European standard for maintenance key performance indicators provides an organizational model of maintenance function, which is composed of six sub-functions: health-safety-environment, management, people competence, engineering, organization and support, and administration and supply (EN:15341, 2019).…”
Section: Diagnostic Framework Of Maintenance Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Tsang et al (1999) introduce a holistic approach to establish maintenance performance measures using the well-known balanced scorecard, which translates a business unit's strategy around four perspectives: financial, customer, internal process, and learning and growth (Kaplan and Norton, 1996). In recent studies, various versions of the modified balanced scorecard have been developed for maintenance performance-related applications, focusing mainly on the inclusion of non-financial perspectives (Campos et al, 2017;Maci an et al, 2019;Sirin et al, 2020;Tanoto et al, 2022), and alignment with objectives and information systems (Campos et al, 2017). The European standard for maintenance key performance indicators provides an organizational model of maintenance function, which is composed of six sub-functions: health-safety-environment, management, people competence, engineering, organization and support, and administration and supply (EN:15341, 2019).…”
Section: Diagnostic Framework Of Maintenance Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent studies, various versions of the modified balanced scorecard have been developed for maintenance performance-related applications, focusing mainly on the inclusion of non-financial perspectives (Campos et al. , 2017; Macián et al. , 2019; Sirin et al.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative for the systems that do not satisfy Markov property are classic reliability methods, allowing to determine empirical characteristics such as: renewal stream, renewal function, time to the next defect or intensity of the renewal stream [6,14,35] and calculating the main system assessment measures based on them [15,23,42]. In the literature, as part of similar studies, various models are presented [30,43], including semi-Markov [7,24] and also those using artificial neural networks [10,33], factorization algorithm [31], fault trees [52] or reliability models [36,42].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%