1981
DOI: 10.1300/j075v03n02_03
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maintaining New Procedures Using Feedback to Staff, a Hierarchical Reporting System, and a Multidisciplinary Management Group

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Building supervision hierarchies may not help make staff more responsive to clients. For example, in a study designed to teach a group of hospital staff to run an `activity period' for one hour each week day with a small group of young people with severe and profound learning disabilities, Coles and Blunden (1981) implemented a `monitoring hierarchy' to keep the intervention running (this was needed even though the intervention produced demonstrable benefits to clients). The nurse responsible for running the activity period made a weekly report to their line manager.…”
Section: The Culture Of the Servicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Building supervision hierarchies may not help make staff more responsive to clients. For example, in a study designed to teach a group of hospital staff to run an `activity period' for one hour each week day with a small group of young people with severe and profound learning disabilities, Coles and Blunden (1981) implemented a `monitoring hierarchy' to keep the intervention running (this was needed even though the intervention produced demonstrable benefits to clients). The nurse responsible for running the activity period made a weekly report to their line manager.…”
Section: The Culture Of the Servicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Training in itself, however, rarely makes a durable change in performance without the application of staff management techniques to promote maintenance of newly acquired behaviors or duties (Coles & Blunden, 1981;Kazdin, 1973;Panyan, Boozer, & Morris, 1970;Quilitch, 1975;Reid, Parsons, & Green, 1989;Whitman, Scibak, & Reid, 1983). Kazdin (1973) emphasized that performance extinction should be expected without management controls to followtraining.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have demonstrated management success through the use of antecedent-consequent component combinations as an intervention package (Coles & Blunden, 1981;Ivancic, Reid, Iwata, Faw, & Page, 1981;Parsons, Schepis, Reid, McCarn, & Green, 1987;Seys & Duker, 1986). Unfortunately, analyses of the individual intervention components that were critical to the success are not possible due to the simultaneous application of antecedents, consequences, and self-management procedures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Christian, 1983). Relatedly, the long-term effectiveness of interventions has been addressed infrequently, with only a few studies (e.g., Burg, Reid, & Lattimore, 1979;Coles & Blunden, 1981;Dyer et al, 1984) (Grossman, 1983). All residents were ambulatory and the majority were over 18 years of age.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A resident turning a toy fire station upside down is an-example of engaged behavior because such manipulation of the building is not how the toy was intended to be used. Typically, the tern engaged has been used to denote the entire range of behaviors that we defined individually here as functional active treatment, nonfunctional active treatment, and engaged behavior (Coles & Blunden, 1981;Spangler & Marshall, 1983). Our purpose in defining each type of activity separately was to provide a more detailed assessment of the therapeutic quality of resident activity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%