2008
DOI: 10.1007/s10734-008-9175-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘Maintaining competence’: a grounded theory typology of approaches to teaching in higher education

Abstract: This paper presents a contingency theory of approaches to teaching in Higher Education adopted by university academics who teach heterogeneous student cohorts within a changing university context. The study is located within the substantive context of academics within Australian universities who teach within the broad field of management studies. Orthodox grounded theory is employed to generate a contingency typology comprised of four separate teaching approaches: Distancing, Adapting, Clarifying, and Relating… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
23
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Here the distinction is between activities focusing on improving or enhancing an instructor's individual teaching practice versus activities that engage faculty in teaching enhancement as a socially situated practice D'Eon, Overgaard, & Rutledge, 2000;Gregory & Jones, 2009;McAlpine, Weston, Timmermans, Berthiaume, & Fairbank-Roch, 2006). Here the distinction is between activities focusing on improving or enhancing an instructor's individual teaching practice versus activities that engage faculty in teaching enhancement as a socially situated practice D'Eon, Overgaard, & Rutledge, 2000;Gregory & Jones, 2009;McAlpine, Weston, Timmermans, Berthiaume, & Fairbank-Roch, 2006).…”
Section: Contextual Positioningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here the distinction is between activities focusing on improving or enhancing an instructor's individual teaching practice versus activities that engage faculty in teaching enhancement as a socially situated practice D'Eon, Overgaard, & Rutledge, 2000;Gregory & Jones, 2009;McAlpine, Weston, Timmermans, Berthiaume, & Fairbank-Roch, 2006). Here the distinction is between activities focusing on improving or enhancing an instructor's individual teaching practice versus activities that engage faculty in teaching enhancement as a socially situated practice D'Eon, Overgaard, & Rutledge, 2000;Gregory & Jones, 2009;McAlpine, Weston, Timmermans, Berthiaume, & Fairbank-Roch, 2006).…”
Section: Contextual Positioningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also allows continuous assessments to take place and to provide second chances for students to improve (Slee, 2010). This also gives the tutor time to explore what skills international students bring with them and what expectations they may have (McLean and Ransom, 2008) by allowing strategies that utilise the experience and knowledge of students to be developed (Egege and Kutieleh, 2004; Gregory and Jones, 2009). If this is done, the second semester can take more of the traditional ‘M’ (Masterliness) level.…”
Section: Proposed Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Case study zorientowane jest na studenta, ponieważ zachęca studentów do przemyśleń na temat tego, czego się dotychczas uczyli (Gregory, Jones, 2009). Nauczanie przy wykorzystaniu tej metody ma wymiar w większej mierze praktyczny, a nie teoretyczny, ponieważ bazuje na realnym problemie biznesowym.…”
Section: Case Study W Edukacji Ekonomicznej I Przedsiębiorczejunclassified