“Mainstreaming” foresight program development in the public sector

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to develop a framework for benchmarking the maturity of public sector foresight programs and outlines strategies that program managers can use to overcome obstacles to foresight program development in government. Design/methodology/approach The public sector foresight benchmarking framework is informed by a bibliometric analysis and comprehensive review of the literature on public sector foresight, as well as three rounds of semi-structured interviews conducted over the course of a collaborative 18-month project with a relatively young department-level foresight program at the government of an Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) country. The paper frames public sector organizations as “complex adaptive systems” and draws from other government initiatives that require fundamental organizational change, namely, “gender mainstreaming”. Findings Nascent or less mature programs tend to be output-focused and disconnected from the policy cycle, while more mature programs balance outputs and participation as they intervene strategically in the policy cycle. Foresight program development requires that managers simultaneously pursue change at three levels: technical, structural and cultural. Therefore, successful strategies are multi-dimensional, incremental and iterative. Originality/value The paper addresses two important gaps in the literature on public sector foresight programs by comprehensively describing the key attributes of mature and immature public sector foresight programs, and providing flexible, practical strategies for program development. The paper also pushes the boundaries of thinking about foresight by integrating insights from complexity theory and complexity-informed organizational change theory.

A Fiscal Policy Foresight Tax Model, Shadow Economy Reduction, and E-Payment Institutionalization as a Result of Knowledge Management

“…Furthermore, effective governance aimed at achieving harmonious order requires fundamental elements of analysis, prediction, and foresight at either a low or high level of complexity. Governance foresight strategies can be developed by bringing foresight activities closer to policy cycles through consultation and coordination (Janzwood & Piereder, 2019).…”

Evidence- And Foresight-Based Policy: Dichotomy or Overlap?

“…It should allow politicians dealing with the next elections, to become statesman dealing with the next generation, as John Rawls formulated it (Rawls, 1971). Foresight methodologies are designed to help policymakers reconcile the inevitable conflicts that arise between immediate decision-making and long-term planning (Janzwood, 2019). Something which can hardly be achieved through a more straightforward evidence-based approach.…”

Augmented and virtual reality in apparel industry: a bibliometric review and future research agenda

“…Scholars (Janzwood and Piereder, 2019;Paananen and Ma ¨kinen, 2013;Suominen and Seppa ¨nen, 2014) established that bibliometric analysis study is a well-accepted methodology for providing a state-of-the-art review. Bibliometric analysis has the potential to expand knowledge and uncover gaps in the existing literature (Bhattacharyya and Dash, 2021; Goel et al, 2021).…”