Main trends of government regulation of sectoral digitalization

Glotko, Andrei V.; Polyakova, Aleksandra; Kuznetsova, M.Yu.; Kovalenko, Kseniya E.; Shichiyakh, Rustem Adamovich; Melnik, Margarita V.

doi:10.9770/jesi.2020.7.3(48)

Cited by 19 publications

(15 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Third, this study only focused on the users' adoption of G2C. Recently, various digital technologies have been widely used in the government regulation of the industry, such as the milk-producing industry [50]. Therefore, future research needs to pay more attention to the government's adoption of information technology and its influencing factors.…”

Section: Limitations and Future Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Role of Trust and Risk in Citizens’ E-Government Services Adoption: A Perspective of the Extended UTAUT Model

2021

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This research particularly aims to investigate how trust and perceived risk influence citizens’ e-government adoption. The findings of the study reveal that citizens’ trust of the government (TOG) and trust of the internet (TOI) positively affect citizens’ e-government adoption (EGA); perceived risk (PR) is negatively associated with citizens’ EGA. Interestingly, this study also demonstrates the negative moderating effect of PR on the relationship between TOG and EGA, TOI and EGA. The results also indicate that performance expectancy (PE), effort expectancy (EE), social influence (SI), and facilitation conditions (FC) influence citizens’ EGA positively. Lastly, implications for practice and research are discussed.

show abstract

Section: Limitations and Future Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Role of Trust and Risk in Citizens’ E-Government Services Adoption: A Perspective of the Extended UTAUT Model

2021

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The next direction of criminal policy has been predetermined by the global trend of a saliently increased application of information and telecommunication networks for a wide range of needs (Glotko et al, 2020;Lipinsky et al, 2020). Universal digitalization creates the opportunity to commit a crime in the virtual space, or to become a victim of a digital encroachment (Győry, 2020).…”

Section: Trend 3 Digitalization Of Societymentioning

confidence: 99%

Trends In Russian Criminal Policy In The Context Of The Pandemic Crisis

Gоlikova¹

2022

European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article is intended to assess the legislative innovations that appeared in the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation during the spread of the Corona virus pandemic (COVID-19) from the point of view of their feasibility and necessity. Within the framework of the study of trends in Russian criminal policy, based on the analysis of changes in the text of the criminal law and administrative legislation for the 1 year period (April 2020-April 2021), five basic trends were identified, taking into account the monitoring of scientific publications. A scientifically-based assessment of the identified trends has made it possible to answer important questions in the areas of effective use of criminal legislation, namely the efficiency of the state's response to the needs of society during the crisis associated with the pandemic; the usability of novelties; the criminological validity of the bans introduced. The study applied a systematic and structural approach; a formal, legal, sociological, formal and logical method of expert assessment. The study also highlights a clear tendency on the part of the legislator to broaden the scope of criminal liability in order to reflect the process of digitalization in framing criminal legislation. As a conclusion, it is noted that current trends in criminal policy do not meet the criteria of a systematic and integrated approach. Priority measures to remedy the situation are proposed.

show abstract

“…E-government is the process of changing the public sector through digitalization and new information management techniques, a process whose ultimate goal is to streamline public administration and increase the degree of citizen participation in the administrative process (Lincaru et al 2018;Glotko et al 2020;Burhanudddin et al 2019;Afonasova et al 2019;Sidorenko et al 2019). E-government is the provision by the state of services fi nanced from public money in electronic form, based on the use of information and communication technology (Joseph 2017;Müller and Skau 2015;Moon 2002).…”

Section: E-government In the Literature And In Practicementioning

confidence: 99%

E-Government in European Countries, a Comparative Approach Using the Principal Components Analysis

Androniceanu

Georgescu

2021

NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The digitalization of public administration is a necessary condition for the economic and social development of each country. In this context, e-government is developing and diversifying its forms of implementation, contributing significantly to the efficiency of public administration, to increasing the degree of transparency and to reducing corruption in public institutions. The aim of the research was to know how the states of the European Union evolved from the point of view of e-government and what influence it had on the economic development of the analyzed states and on the European citizens during the analyzed period. For this we selected ten research variables from several databases: Eurostat, the World Bank and the United Nations E-Government Development Database (UNeGovDD) of the United Nations. The period for which we did the analysis is 2010 – 2019. Using EViews 12 we applied panel Principal Component Analysis to reduce the 10-variable panel into a lower dimension of 3 principal components to find the underlying simplified structure. The three principal components retained explain about 76.5 % of the initial information. The research results show significant differences between the states analyzed, in terms of e-government, but also in terms of the impact it has on government effectiveness, controlling corruption, e-participation of European citizens and the economic development of Member States. In countries with a high level of e-government implementation, governance is efficient, corruption is low, citizen involvement is higher and economic development is faster.

show abstract

Main trends of government regulation of sectoral digitalization

Cited by 19 publications

References 21 publications

The Role of Trust and Risk in Citizens’ E-Government Services Adoption: A Perspective of the Extended UTAUT Model

The Role of Trust and Risk in Citizens’ E-Government Services Adoption: A Perspective of the Extended UTAUT Model

Trends In Russian Criminal Policy In The Context Of The Pandemic Crisis

E-Government in European Countries, a Comparative Approach Using the Principal Components Analysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About