2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.anucene.2020.107612
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Main outcomes from the IVR code benchmark performed in the European IVMR project

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(18 reference statements)
0
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This identification would require performing more sensitivity studies with the codes and a more precise evaluation of the existing uncertainties in material properties. Such work was initiated in the scope of the benchmark exercise on IVR performed between ASTEC, ATHLET-CD, HEFEST-SOCRAT, HEFEST-URAN, MAAP EDF proprietary version and PROCOR (Carénini et al 2019). The predominant effect of metal properties compared to those of the oxide was confirmed.…”
Section: Ranking Of Parameters Impacting the Risks Of Excessive Heat ...mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This identification would require performing more sensitivity studies with the codes and a more precise evaluation of the existing uncertainties in material properties. Such work was initiated in the scope of the benchmark exercise on IVR performed between ASTEC, ATHLET-CD, HEFEST-SOCRAT, HEFEST-URAN, MAAP EDF proprietary version and PROCOR (Carénini et al 2019). The predominant effect of metal properties compared to those of the oxide was confirmed.…”
Section: Ranking Of Parameters Impacting the Risks Of Excessive Heat ...mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Анализ расчетных оценок скорости окисления показывает, что наиболее чувствительным параметром выражения (9) является теплопроводность оксидной корки, неопределенность значения которой не превышает 25%. Приведенные в [37] результаты бенчмарка IVR-кодов свидетельствуют, что разброс значений исходных параметров моделей может превышать 50%. Это может приводить к вариации расчетных оценок до 70% от средней величины.…”
Section: определение параметров модели и обсуждение результатовunclassified
“…Это может приводить к вариации расчетных оценок до 70% от средней величины. Таким образом, предложенная расчетная зависимость может быть интегрирована в существующие расчетные коды без существенного увеличения неопределенности расчетных оценок [37].…”
Section: определение параметров модели и обсуждение результатовunclassified
“…It is secondly due to the uncertainty of physical models used in integral codes for severe accident analysis. The calculation results of integral codes (including ASTEC, ATHLET-CD, and MAAP_EDF) for the minimum vessel thickness show a large variability (about ±80%) (Carénini et al, 2019). The significant discrepancy leads to a great uncertainty in the reasonable assessment of IVR-ERVC effectiveness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%