2012
DOI: 10.9790/0853-0320507
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Main Left Coronary Artery System – Angiographic Anatomy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This differed from the results of Kulkarni & Mehta (2012) and Jaishree et al (2015) who found 11.54 % and 14.5 %, respectively (Table III).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…This differed from the results of Kulkarni & Mehta (2012) and Jaishree et al (2015) who found 11.54 % and 14.5 %, respectively (Table III).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…In general, LCA was reported to have wider Ostia than the right (Silitongo et al, 2016;Thakre et al, 2017). Also, the ostial diameters are subject to differences in ethnicity and geographic location (Kulkarni Mehta, 2012;Kulkarni & Paranjpe, 2015). These findings force cardiologists and coronary angiographer to know the average diameters of the LCA within each specific population, and also, the designing or selection of catheters should consider the ostial diameter (Nasr & El Tahlawi, 2018;Luckrajh et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%