Magnocellular and parvocellular pathway contributions to face processing in adolescents

Grose-Fifer, Jill; Mascarelli, Danielle; Kirilko, Elvira; Constante, Kevin; Medina, Amy; diFilipo, Danielle

doi:10.1167/15.12.163

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Furthermore, two ERP studies focusing on the development of configural face processing found that sensitivities of the P1 component to face inversion is still developing in adolescence in an SF-specific manner (Grose-Fifer et al, 2015;Peters, Vlamings, & Kemner, 2013). Notably, the latter two studies used well-recognizable complex images rather than abstract stimuli, with SF filter settings also differing from ours (LSF: ≤ 2 cpd; HSF: ≥ 6 cpd in Peters et al, 2013).…”

Section: The Effect Of Spatial Frequencies On Erpsmentioning

confidence: 63%

Tracking changes in spatial frequency sensitivity during natural image processing in school age: an event-related potential study

Rokszin

Győri-Dani

Bácsi

et al. 2018

Journal of Experimental Child Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Several studies have shown that behavioral and electrophysiological correlates of processing visual images containing low or high spatial frequency (LSF or HSF) information undergo development after early childhood. However, the maturation of spatial frequency sensitivity during school age has been investigated using abstract stimuli only. The aim of the current study was to assess how LSF and HSF features affect the processing of everyday photographs at the behavioral and electrophysiological levels in children aged 7-15 years and adults. We presented grayscale images containing either animals or vehicles and their luminance-matched modified versions filtered at low or high spatial frequencies. Modulations of classification accuracy, reaction time, and visual event-related potentials (posterior P1 and N1 components) were compared across five developmental groups and three image types. We found disproportionately worse response accuracies for LSF stimuli relative to HSF images in children aged 7 or 8 years, an effect that was accompanied by smaller LSF-evoked P1 amplitudes during this age period. At 7 or 8 years of age, P1 and N1 amplitudes were modulated by HSF and LSF stimuli (P1: HSF > LSF; N1: LSF > HSF), with a gradual shift toward the opposite pattern (P1: LSF > HSF; N1: HSF > LSF) with increasing age. Our results indicate that early cortical processing of both spatial frequency ranges undergo substantial development during school age, with a relative delay of LSF analysis, and underline the utility of our paradigm in tracking the maturation of LSF versus HSF sensitivity in this age group.

show abstract

Section: The Effect Of Spatial Frequencies On Erpsmentioning

confidence: 63%