1998
DOI: 10.1038/28134
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnitudes of sea-level lowstands of the past 500,000 years

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
361
0
7

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 562 publications
(382 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(2 reference statements)
14
361
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The minimum highest sea-level altitude estimated to System II is 9.5 ± 1 m, to System III is 7.7 ± 1 m, and to System IV is 3 ± 1 m. Rohling et al (1998) and Rabineau et al (2006) established magnitudes of lowstands to the past 500 kyr. Considering the correlation with oxygen isotope stages to determine the age of sequences lowstand, it is possible to determine that sea level was more than 100 m below its current position during each lowstand (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The minimum highest sea-level altitude estimated to System II is 9.5 ± 1 m, to System III is 7.7 ± 1 m, and to System IV is 3 ± 1 m. Rohling et al (1998) and Rabineau et al (2006) established magnitudes of lowstands to the past 500 kyr. Considering the correlation with oxygen isotope stages to determine the age of sequences lowstand, it is possible to determine that sea level was more than 100 m below its current position during each lowstand (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The altitudes of sea-level highs are defined through topographic measurements from this work, Tomazelli and Dillenburg (2007), and Lopes et al (2014). The amplitudes of lowstands are from Rohling et al (1998).…”
Section: High-frequency Sedimentary Record: Barrier-lagoon Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An exception is Site 980 which shows very similar SST values for MIS 1 and MIS 11 (McManus et al, 1999). However, the method of SST estimates employed in that latter study involved changes in global ice volume which might have introduced further uncertainties, as different ice-volume reconstructions show controversial results for MIS 11 (Rohling et al, 1998;Hearty et al, 1999;McManus et al, 2003;Kandiano and Bauch, 2007). Our data show that the SST optimum in the subtropical as well as in the middle latitudes was reached during the late phase which is consistent with previously published foraminiferal and alkenone SST data of MIS 11c from the wider North Atlantic region (de Abreu et al, 2005;Martrat et al, 2007;Stein et al, 2009;Rodrigues et al, 2011;Stein et al, 2009) .…”
Section: Dynamics Of Sea-surface Properties In the Lower Latitudesmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Moreover, the aplanktonic LGM Red Sea conditions offer strong independent evidence that LGM sea level was lower than in the PGM. It formed under extreme salinities (S ¼~50 to~70) due to near-isolation of the Red Sea from the world ocean by the shallow Hanish Sill, Bab-elMandab Strait (~137 m deep, relative to an LGM global mean sealevel drop of~130 m); such extreme conditions were not reached during the PGM (Rohling et al, 1998;Fenton et al, 2000;Siddall et al, 2003). This implies either that: (a) the sill was uplifted between the PGM and LGM; and/or (b) sea level dropped more during the LGM than the PGM.…”
Section: Denton and Hughes 2002mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even for the PGM, information is so limited that studies often invoke an LGM-like ice volume (e.g., Lambeck and Chappell, 2001;Yokoyama and Esat, 2011). Initial assessment of Red Sea glacial sea-level lowstands seemed to support that view (Rohling et al, 1998), but only constrained the LGM sea-level drop to have been at least as low as that of the PGM, without giving a maximum value. Here we show that subsequent improvements to the Red Sea record firmly indicate a greater sea-level drop during the LGM than during the PGM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%