2022
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010523
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnitude-sensitive reaction times reveal non-linear time costs in multi-alternative decision-making

Abstract: Optimality analysis of value-based decisions in binary and multi-alternative choice settings predicts that reaction times should be sensitive only to differences in stimulus magnitudes, but not to overall absolute stimulus magnitude. Yet experimental work in the binary case has shown magnitude sensitive reaction times, and theory shows that this can be explained by switching from linear to multiplicative time costs, but also by nonlinear subjective utility. Thus disentangling explanations for observed magnitud… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Few studies examine ternary or higher-order decision-making. In a notable exception, Physarum plasmodia were given a choice between 3 food sources that were all identical in value (Marshall et al 2022 ). When the sum of the quality of all the food sources was low (low ‘magnitude’), plasmodia took significantly longer to make a decision than when the options had high magnitude; an identical result was recorded by Dussutour and colleagues ( 2019 ) in a binary-choice scenario.…”
Section: Physarum’s Cognitive Capabilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Few studies examine ternary or higher-order decision-making. In a notable exception, Physarum plasmodia were given a choice between 3 food sources that were all identical in value (Marshall et al 2022 ). When the sum of the quality of all the food sources was low (low ‘magnitude’), plasmodia took significantly longer to make a decision than when the options had high magnitude; an identical result was recorded by Dussutour and colleagues ( 2019 ) in a binary-choice scenario.…”
Section: Physarum’s Cognitive Capabilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We consider a typical decision-making task [17,22,13]; participants need to decide which of two gray patches presented on a computer screen is brighter, Figure 1. Specifically, during each trial, participants are presented with a fixation cross at the centre of the screen, and, equidistant from the fixation cross, two stimuli, in the form of homogeneous, round, grey patches on a black background.…”
Section: A Value-sensitive Decision-making Taskmentioning
confidence: 99%