2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.08.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnitude of the sediment transport event due to the Late Pleistocene sector collapse of Asama volcano, central Japan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, even if some small primary hummocks were formed at the initial stage, they could have been hidden by post-collapse modifications and surficial sediment deposition in this upstream area of the DAD (Yoshida and Sugai, 2007a), as indicated by the presence of convex-up cross profiles at an elevation of 2800-2300 m (Fig. 9, or around the letter B in Fig.…”
Section: Debris Avalanche and Formation Of Hummocksmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…On the other hand, even if some small primary hummocks were formed at the initial stage, they could have been hidden by post-collapse modifications and surficial sediment deposition in this upstream area of the DAD (Yoshida and Sugai, 2007a), as indicated by the presence of convex-up cross profiles at an elevation of 2800-2300 m (Fig. 9, or around the letter B in Fig.…”
Section: Debris Avalanche and Formation Of Hummocksmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The volume of the missing edifice by the sector collapse is calculated as the sum of the elevation differences between the reconstructed surface and the present landform: 12.75 × 10 8 m 3 by the linear method and 10.67 × 10 8 m 3 by the Bézier method. If we assume the preexisting fluvial dissection of the edifice or a crater on the top (Aramaki, 1963), this reconstructed volume may be reduced by approximately 10 % (Aramaki, 1963;Yonechi et al, 1988;Yoshida and Sugai, 2007a). The estimated source volume of the sector collapse is then given as 9.60-11.48 × 10 8 m 3 .…”
Section: Volume Estimation Of Dad By the Source Area Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Initial landslide volume can be estimated by different methodologies depending on the mathematical description selected, with hydrological, geomorphological or both kind of features taken into account (Gartner et al 2008;Marchi et al 2010;Chang et al 2011;Friedel 2011;Tsai et al 2011;Robinson and Clynne 2012;Rocco et al 2012). Other authors including Yoshida and Sugai (2007) or Santi and Morandi (2013) propose measuring and simplifying the deposit dimensions using common methods such as truck remobilization or field observations (thickness, sediment width, and flow-path length). Geographical information systems (GIS) are also commonly used to estimate sediment volume based on pre-and post-topographical layers where the slide boundary has been identified (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%