2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11523-015-0396-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnitude of PD-1, PD-L1 and T Lymphocyte Expression on Tissue from Castration-Resistant Prostate Adenocarcinoma: An Exploratory Analysis

Abstract: Approximately 19 % of patients in our series showed simultaneous high PD-1/PD-L1 immunoscores, and were the best candidates for receiving targeted anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy, as determined using a tissue based rationale.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
43
1
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
3
43
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The purpose of our study was to provide some information of understanding the immune profile of prostate TME, in which we particularly focused on PD‐L1 + tumor‐associated nerves, FoxP3 + T reg cells, CD3 + T lymphocytes and CD8 + T cytotoxic cells. Thus far, various anit‐PD‐L1 antibodies have been used to detect PD‐L1 expressions in prostate cancers in different studies, however, the targeted epitopes, isotypes and sources of different anti–PD‐L1 clones contribute to diverse results published at present . We thus further verified a previously validated clone E1L3N (C‐terminal) with clone E1J2J (N‐terminal), complying with the independent antibody strategy proposed by International Working Group for Antibody Validation (IWGAV) …”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The purpose of our study was to provide some information of understanding the immune profile of prostate TME, in which we particularly focused on PD‐L1 + tumor‐associated nerves, FoxP3 + T reg cells, CD3 + T lymphocytes and CD8 + T cytotoxic cells. Thus far, various anit‐PD‐L1 antibodies have been used to detect PD‐L1 expressions in prostate cancers in different studies, however, the targeted epitopes, isotypes and sources of different anti–PD‐L1 clones contribute to diverse results published at present . We thus further verified a previously validated clone E1L3N (C‐terminal) with clone E1J2J (N‐terminal), complying with the independent antibody strategy proposed by International Working Group for Antibody Validation (IWGAV) …”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Using clone EPR1161(2) (Abcam) and clone 015 (Sino Biological), two independent investigations reported that high positive rates of PD‐L1 were found on primary prostate tumor cells and CRPC cells in tissue microarrays, respectively . However, when detecting with clone E1L3N, our data revealed that only one out of 73 prostate cancer specimens had histologic evidence of PD‐L1 cell surface membrane staining and none of the 7 CRPC samples showed tumor cell positive (Figs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Its binding to specific ligands (PD-1 ligands), expressed on inhibitory cell lineages and tumor cells, promotes reversible CTL anergy and, on the long term, induces antigenspecific CTL exhaustion. 12,[60][61][62] This event represents a major mechanism of tumor escape and acquired tumor cell resistance to the immune-effectors. More recently, the clinical development of mAbs to PD-1, such as Nivolumab and Pembrolizumab, has given a strong pulse to the design of cancer immunotherapy trials also outside the malignant melanoma area.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A signature defining a potential response to anti-PD-1 therapy has not been developed, such as quantifying and correlating PD-1/PD-L1 expression to response or associating response for patients with specific prior treatments. The data regarding expression of PD-1/PD-L1 in prostate cancer is conflicting [60, 61,62]. Furthermore, it is possible that therapy for prostate cancer (such as antiandrogens) results in relative immunosuppression [63] that theoretically may blunt anti-PD-1 response.…”
Section: Treatment Opportunities For Homologous Recombination-deficiementioning
confidence: 99%