2018
DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20180021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnitude of cone beam CT image artifacts related to zirconium and titanium implants: impact on image quality

Abstract: The quantity and magnitude of artifacts in CBCT are influenced by the type of implant and CBCT unit. Although they are more pronounced in regions closer to the implant and located at 90° in relation to the mandibular long axis, they can reach as far as 3.5 cm from the artifact-generator object.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
50
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
50
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…facts to different regions of the CBCT volume. 1,2 Further investigation of this possibility is important for confirming whether errors in the reconstructed data can affect the image quality in regions distant from the artifact-generating material.…”
Section: Magnitude Of Beam-hardening Artifacts Produced By Gutta-percmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…facts to different regions of the CBCT volume. 1,2 Further investigation of this possibility is important for confirming whether errors in the reconstructed data can affect the image quality in regions distant from the artifact-generating material.…”
Section: Magnitude Of Beam-hardening Artifacts Produced By Gutta-percmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the presence of metal posts and gutta-percha is very common in dental examinations, until now, studies investigating the magnitude of the artifacts in CBCT images have only focused on dental implants. 1,2,6,7 As different materials produce artifacts of different magnitude and as endodontic materials typically have a high atomic number, 11 studying how the artifacts relate to these materials throughout the volume of the CBCT scan is relevant. Since the tube current is directly related to the administered radiation dose, it should be set as low as diagnostically acceptable.…”
Section: Magnitude Of Beam-hardening Artifacts Produced By Gutta-percmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To determine the position of the ROIs, lines with different angulations in relation to the dental implant posi-tion and circles with different radii that were centered on the dental implant were established according to previously described methodologies. 9,14 Figure 2 shows the lines and circles distributed around the dental implant according to the angulations and radii used. The 29 ROIs were distributed in 6 regions according to the length of the radius from the implant (region 1, 10 mm; region 2, 15 mm; region 3, 20 mm; region 4, 25 mm; region 5, 30 mm; region 6, 35 mm) ( Fig.…”
Section: Image Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Os resultados obtidos no presente estudo evidenciam que os artefatos de distorção, caracterizados pela super ou subestimação das estruturas avaliadas nas imagens de TCFC, produzidos pela radiação X policromática, são intrínsecos aos processos de escaneamento e reconstrução, e que sua ocorrência pode prejudicar a análise quali-quantitativa, bem como influenciar de forma negativa o processo de diagnóstico clínico em Endodontia (PATEL et al, 2015;VASCONCELOS et al, 2015;ESTRELA et al, 2018;FONTENELE et al, 2018;TANG et al, 2018;VASCONCELOS et al, 2018), uma vez que impossibilitam a delimitação exata da forma original das estruturas avaliadas (SCHULZE et al, 2011;DECURCIO et al, 2012;BRITO et al, 2014;VASCONCELOS et al, 2015;CODARI et al, 2017;GAETA-ARAUJO et al, 2017;VERSIANI et al, 2018). Nesse sentido, pode-se inferir que a sub ou superestimação das estruturas dificultam a interpretação das imagens de TCFC, levando a análises inconclusivas, podendo mascarar ou influenciar o diagnóstico de fraturas e perfurações (NAGARAJAPPA; DWIVEDI; TIWARI, 2015;CODARI et al, 2017;VASCONCELOS et al, 2018;VERSIANI et al, 2018), de variações anatômicas como istmos, canais acessórios e laterais (VIZZOTTO et al, 2013;VASCONCELOS et al, 2015), bem como de sub ou sobreobturação, levando muitas vezes à realização de erros nos planejamentos e protocolos de tratamento (COSTA et al, 2012;HASSAN et al, 2012;MELO et al, 2013;VIZZOTTO et al, 2013;BRITO et al, 2014;NAGARAJAPPA;DWIVEDI;TIWARI, 2015;CODARI et al, 2017;HUANG et al, 2017;VASCONCELOS et al, 2018;VERSIANI et al, 2018).…”
Section: Escaneamento Em Tcfcunclassified