2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.tecto.2019.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnitude of completeness, b-value, and spatial correlation dimension of earthquakes in the South Baikal Basin, Baikal Rift System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where 𝑀𝑀 � is Magnitude of Completeness, define as the lowest magnitude can be detected completely in the a space-time volume [15,16,17]. The Magnitude of Completeness is a statistical way to determine the quality of an earthquake catalog [18].…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where 𝑀𝑀 � is Magnitude of Completeness, define as the lowest magnitude can be detected completely in the a space-time volume [15,16,17]. The Magnitude of Completeness is a statistical way to determine the quality of an earthquake catalog [18].…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It gives information dimension for q=1, and correlation dimension for q=2 (Roy & Padhi, 2007). Therefore, for q = 0, the formula reduces to 𝐷 0 = − lim 𝑟→0 log 𝐶 𝑞 (𝑟) log 𝑟 The above formula is similar to the box counting technique (Aggarwal et al, 2017;Mandal & Rodkin, 2011;Radziminovich et al, 2019) as…”
Section: Fractal Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the reasons for this deviation is inadequate data acquisition. At the lower magnitude end, this is apparent from the difficulty in determining the magnitude of completeness, Mc (Cao & Gao, 2002;Godano et al, 2014;Mignan, 2012;Radziminovich et al, 2019;Raub et al, 2017). Meanwhile, small-scale ruptures can be masked by larger ones, which is also a very significant factor for inadequate data acquisition in rock AE experiments when avalanche destruction occurs during the final loading stage or in high strain rate loading tests (Cox & Meredith, 1993;Liakopoulou et al, 1994;Liu et al, 2015Liu et al, , 2020Meredith & Main, 1990).…”
Section: Deviation From the G-r Law Of Frequency-size Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%