2014
DOI: 10.1186/bf03352390
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnitude determination of deep-focus earthquakes in and around Japan with regional velocity-amplitude data

Abstract: This paper proposes a new method to determine earthquake magnitude for small deep-focus earthquakes by using velocity-amplitude data. For deep-focus earthquakes, body-wave magnitude has been widely used, but it is difficult to directly apply the conventional methods to the data from short-period seismometers of regional networks. In the proposed method, moment magnitude is used to obtain the attenuation function for epicentral distance and focal depth, where the influence of inhomogeneous Q structure is incorp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(42 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The major difference between tectonic tremor and intraslab earthquakes in Nankai is the source depth, so it is likely that the material at depths between the tremor event hypocenters and intraslab earthquake hypocenters has a characteristic attenuation that affects our estimation of C. Based on this idea, we construct a simple layered attenuation structure (Fig. 11a) Attenuation structure (Katsumata, 2001) Q s =500…”
Section: Synthetic Tests For Distance Dependent Attenuationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The major difference between tectonic tremor and intraslab earthquakes in Nankai is the source depth, so it is likely that the material at depths between the tremor event hypocenters and intraslab earthquake hypocenters has a characteristic attenuation that affects our estimation of C. Based on this idea, we construct a simple layered attenuation structure (Fig. 11a) Attenuation structure (Katsumata, 2001) Q s =500…”
Section: Synthetic Tests For Distance Dependent Attenuationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, 1% of PGV are replaced by a random value from 100 to 1600 nm=s, which captures the effect of random noise. Figure 10a shows the synthetic PGV data generated using the attenuation structure of Katsumata (2001), the estimated C and site factors for the different distance limits, and synthetic path-averaged attenuation for specific hypocentral distance. The site factors are stable and well reproduced in this estimation.…”
Section: Synthetic Tests For Distance-dependent Attenuationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The intrinsic attenuation factor of Q = 184 is used. This quality factor is calculated on the basis of the depth‐dependent attenuation model in Japan of Katsumata [2001] by assuming the average depth of a tremor to be 35 km. The weight factor of the amplitude analysis at the i th station is set as the average of the maximum correlation function among the pairs, including the i th station, and these values are larger than 0.7.…”
Section: Estimating Tremor Source Location and Seismic Energymentioning
confidence: 99%