1991
DOI: 10.1001/archderm.127.5.673
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnitude and duration of UV-B-induced tolerance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While cutaneous hyperpigmentation was experienced in the first 2 4 weeks, afterwards there was no evidence of hyperpigmentation although the pigment level was not evaluated clinically at the time of the phototests. The large variation in the baseline MPEo of these patients (skin type 2IV) concords with previous reports (10,29). The highest photoadaptive response was found in subjects with the lowest baseline MPEo; a similar trend was reported for skin type 1-11 as compared to skin type 111-IV (18.7212 versus 15.11211.6) (10).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…While cutaneous hyperpigmentation was experienced in the first 2 4 weeks, afterwards there was no evidence of hyperpigmentation although the pigment level was not evaluated clinically at the time of the phototests. The large variation in the baseline MPEo of these patients (skin type 2IV) concords with previous reports (10,29). The highest photoadaptive response was found in subjects with the lowest baseline MPEo; a similar trend was reported for skin type 1-11 as compared to skin type 111-IV (18.7212 versus 15.11211.6) (10).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In other words, high skin types photoadapted equally per unit of UVR, but they had greater photoadaptation in absolute terms because they were able to tolerate a bigger dose of UVR to begin with, which enabled a greater stimulus to be applied (Oh et al, 2004). Our findings accord with those of Taylor and Stern (1991), who in a study of 37 patients receiving broadband UVB therapy one, two, or three times per week found that skin typing did not predict the protection factor. One explanation is that skin typing is unreliable (Rampen et al, 1988), but clearly it cannot be totally unreliable because it is associated with the MED (Figure 1, Po0.001).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…For these reasons, protection factors will be higher than the AF we have calculated. Studies with UVB have typically found, after at least nine sessions, protection factors of 2-13 (Cripps, 1981;Schothorst et al, 1984;Taylor and Stern, 1991;Gonzalez et al, 1996;Sheehan et al, 1998Sheehan et al, , 2002de Winter et al, 2001). Differences in photoadaptation by body site have not, to our knowledge, been reported (Waterston et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The duration of this increase in tolerance is, however, short. This is the reason why less than one MED, usually 70% of MED, is preferred to be given at each session of phototherapy (8).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%