2009
DOI: 10.1089/dia.2009.0033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnitude and Determinants of Ocular Morbidities Among Persons with Diabetes in a Project in Ahmedabad, India

Abstract: The prevalence of DR was low. Long duration of diabetes, poor control of blood sugar, presence of nephropathy, and hypertension were associated with DR. Good vision could mislead about the severity of DR.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, we noted that persons with DR had significantly higher risk of impaired vision. This was also noted by Vyas et al (26). It is worth noting that even with DR, a large proportion of cases had excellent grade of visual acuity and could carry on their daily living activities with ease.…”
Section: Elshafei Et Alsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…In our study, we noted that persons with DR had significantly higher risk of impaired vision. This was also noted by Vyas et al (26). It is worth noting that even with DR, a large proportion of cases had excellent grade of visual acuity and could carry on their daily living activities with ease.…”
Section: Elshafei Et Alsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…55 There have been a number of large population-based studies from several parts of India that have reported a prevalence of DR ranging from 10.5% to 22.6%, with the higher figures being reported in older studies (Table 4). 20,[56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68] The variation is partly due to differences in the definitions and classification systems used to record DR. There were no differences found among rural and urban populations.…”
Section: Diabetic Retinopathymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To calculate the sample size of this cross-sectional study, we assumed that the prevalence of glaucoma among diabetics was 14.6%. [ 5 ] To achieve 95% confidence intervals (CIs), 3% error margin and clustering effect of 1.5, we required 794 randomly selected type II diabetics. To compensate for the loss of data, an additional 5% was added to the sample size.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prevalence of glaucoma in diabetics ranges from 4.96% to 14.6%. [ 4 5 ] However, geographic distribution and race can affect the association between glaucoma and diabetes. [ 6 7 ] To the best of our knowledge, there are no peer review papers documenting the magnitude of glaucoma among diabetics in the state of Maharashtra, India.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%