2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2022.102972
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MAGNIMS recommendations for harmonization of MRI data in MS multicenter studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 139 publications
(162 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Harmonization techniques are used to handle non-biological variance introduced by differences in MRI scanners and acquisition protocols [ 25 ]. To remove these unwanted effects, we applied the ComBat harmonization [ 53 , 54 ] in its R implementation (freely available at https://github.com/Jfortin1/ComBatHarmonization ) to all datasets.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Harmonization techniques are used to handle non-biological variance introduced by differences in MRI scanners and acquisition protocols [ 25 ]. To remove these unwanted effects, we applied the ComBat harmonization [ 53 , 54 ] in its R implementation (freely available at https://github.com/Jfortin1/ComBatHarmonization ) to all datasets.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the heterogeneity of scanners and acquisition protocols can potentially affect the consistency of MRI-derived features and, therefore, undermine statistical testing and/or classification performances [ 20 , 21 ]. For this reason, harmonizing the MRI data is generally considered important [ 22 ]–[ 24 ] and specific recommendations for MS multicenter studies have been recently updated [ 25 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This serves as a reminder that all the three components of NEDA are highly subjective and there is no real consensus regarding the definitions of the different components of NEDA ( 11 , 27 ). Apart from between-rater variability ( 28 ), MRI findings may vary across centers due to differing MRI machines and protocols ( 29 ). Relapses are subjective, both for the pwMS and the clinician, and dependent on pwMS -clinician contact ( 30 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparisons of global and local network descriptors between people with MS and HVs were performed with Student’s t tests, and the statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Since the FA-weighted adjacency matrices could suffer from intersite variability because of the heterogeneity of both acquisition protocols, we harmonized the data using the ComBat model ( Fortin et al, 2017 ; De Stefano et al, 2022 ). All analyses were performed using Python software (version 3.8.8) and the SciPy package (version 1.8.0).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%