2023 IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV) 2023
DOI: 10.1109/wacv56688.2023.00274
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnification Prior: A Self-Supervised Method for Learning Representations on Breast Cancer Histopathological Images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“… a , Average accuracy comparison at the patient level for different resolutions. The compared models include CNN models (Deep 31 , SW 31 , GLPB 48 , RPDB 49 ), weakly supervised models (MIL-NP 32 , MILCNN 32 ), and self-supervised model (MPCS-RP 38 ). b , Average accuracy comparison at the image level for different resolutions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… a , Average accuracy comparison at the patient level for different resolutions. The compared models include CNN models (Deep 31 , SW 31 , GLPB 48 , RPDB 49 ), weakly supervised models (MIL-NP 32 , MILCNN 32 ), and self-supervised model (MPCS-RP 38 ). b , Average accuracy comparison at the image level for different resolutions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, image-level accuracy does not consider patient-level details. It is calculated as the proportion of correctly classified images among all images, regardless of the patients they belong to 38 . Let N p represents the number of pathological images owned by patient p. For each patient, N rec is the number of pathological images that are correctly classified.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The success of these approaches depends on the nature of the ML task and the validity of assumptions underlying these approaches. Recently, self‐supervised learning methods [ 96 , 97 , 98 , 99 ] that exploit supervisory signals in the data itself with the help of domain‐specific as well as domain‐agnostic tasks have proven to be successful for effective tumor detection with limited available annotations. However, development of truly generalizable weakly supervised or self‐supervised approaches remains an open problem [ 28 ].…”
Section: Limitations Challenges and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are a number of studies in the literature which have been applied to these datasets. For instance, many researchers have utilised BreakHis dataset to test their networks [11,12,19,20,[26][27][28][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52]. Zhou et al [45] proposed a novel resolution adaptive network (RAN) to classify different forms of breast cancer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%