1994
DOI: 10.1007/bf00280422
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnification in Drosophila: evidence for an inducible rDNA-specific recombination system

Abstract: An experiment is described that provides evidence for an exchange mechanism to explain the increase in ribosomal gene number that occurs during bobbed magnification. We show that bobbed and bobbed-lethal alleles do not magnify in closed X chromosomes, but that a spontaneous ring opening restores normal magnification. The results provide strong evidence that the elementary magnifying event is unequal sister chromatid exchange, and can be interpreted in the framework of an inducible rDNA-specific recombination s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, rapid changes in rDNA content have been documented in Drosophila 'bobbed' mutants, whose developmental defects are correlated with the loss of large numbers of rRNA genes from the NORs on either the X or Y chromosomes (Ritossa, 1976). Reversal of the bobbed phenotype can occur within several generations in certain genetic backgrounds and is correlated with the amplification (magnification) of the rDNA (Hawley and Tartof, 1985;Komma and Atwood, 1994;Ritossa, 1968). Therefore, it seems clear that NORs are dynamic regions of the genome where changes can occur rapidly.…”
Section: Changes Within the Rdna Of Nor2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, rapid changes in rDNA content have been documented in Drosophila 'bobbed' mutants, whose developmental defects are correlated with the loss of large numbers of rRNA genes from the NORs on either the X or Y chromosomes (Ritossa, 1976). Reversal of the bobbed phenotype can occur within several generations in certain genetic backgrounds and is correlated with the amplification (magnification) of the rDNA (Hawley and Tartof, 1985;Komma and Atwood, 1994;Ritossa, 1968). Therefore, it seems clear that NORs are dynamic regions of the genome where changes can occur rapidly.…”
Section: Changes Within the Rdna Of Nor2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, dual rDNA FISH result indicated that the copy number of 45S rDNA unit might be too low to detect on chromosomes at the cytogenetic level, even though there was the loci on the genome in this species or the plant strains used here. Several evidences of the intraspecifi c variation supported that unequal crossing over was the main mechanism involved in size changes of 45S rDNA sites (Butler and Metzenberg 1989;Komma and Atwood 1994). Determination of 45S rDNA locus in P. amaura, thus, would be possible by using other strains corrected from different population.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of ribosomal genes is supposed to be directly related to the size of the genome, but it can vary among species and even populations (CAPOSSELA et al 1992;MOSCONE et al 1995). It is known that the number of ribosomal genes could vary even very quickly in response to genetic or environmental stress (KOMMA and ATWOOD 1994;WATERS and SCHAAL 1996); moreover the activity of some rDNA clusters (NORs) could be regulated by evolutionary events or position effects (SCHUBERT and KUNZEL 1990). In the observed case, it seems that the change in the number of rDNA sites in the genome is associated to the artificial evolution consequent the domestication of cowpea.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%